The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2014.09.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrating monitor alarms with laboratory test results to enhance patient deterioration prediction

Abstract: Patient monitors in modern hospitals have become ubiquitous but they generate an excessive number of false alarms causing alarm fatigue. Our previous work showed that combinations of frequently co-occurring monitor alarms, called SuperAlarm patterns, were capable of predicting in-hospital code blue events at a lower alarm frequency. In the present study, we extend the conceptual domain of a SuperAlarm to incorporate laboratory test results along with monitor alarms so as to build an integrated data set to mine… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sensitivity (number of warnings generated prior to an event divided by the total number of events [true positives/(true positives + false negatives)]) and a combination of metrics such as false-alarm rate (number of warnings not associated with an event over some unit of time [false positives/monitoring time]) and positive predictive value (number of warnings generated prior to an event divided by the total number of warnings [true positives/(true positives + false positives)]) may be reported to characterize the performance of this type of detection system. As these metrics alone fail to incorporate the timeliness of the detection [19] and patterns leading up to the event into the performance metrics (see below in II. Potential Warning Index Patterns Leading up to an Event ), they may not always provide a complete characterization of the performance of a continuous warning index to predict a change in patient conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sensitivity (number of warnings generated prior to an event divided by the total number of events [true positives/(true positives + false negatives)]) and a combination of metrics such as false-alarm rate (number of warnings not associated with an event over some unit of time [false positives/monitoring time]) and positive predictive value (number of warnings generated prior to an event divided by the total number of warnings [true positives/(true positives + false positives)]) may be reported to characterize the performance of this type of detection system. As these metrics alone fail to incorporate the timeliness of the detection [19] and patterns leading up to the event into the performance metrics (see below in II. Potential Warning Index Patterns Leading up to an Event ), they may not always provide a complete characterization of the performance of a continuous warning index to predict a change in patient conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rather, we expect to integrate the new alarms into the SuperAlarm framework because we anticipate the combination of metrics to identify patients at risk for cardiac arrest has the potential to reduce false positive alarms. A recent study that integrates laboratory test results with existing monitor alarms in the SuperAlarm framework improved the accuracy of code blue event prediction (Bai et al, 2014). This study indicates that SuperAlarm has the potential to incorporate multi-domain clinical data for improved patient monitoring and possibly reduction of false alarms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With less emphasis on individual alarms, the framework is less sensitive to false alarms. Bai et al further integrated laboratory test results with existing monitor alarms in the SuperAlarm framework to improve prediction performance (Bai et al, 2014). Hu et al also derived additional alarms based on ECG metrics currently not available on patient monitors (Hu et al, 2013), which could be further incorporated into the SuperAlarm framework as a possible solution to improve cardiac patient monitoring.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[31] combined lab tests with monitor alarms to build "SuperAlarm" patterns, which provided fair accuracy at detecting code blue events while maintaining low rates of false alarm. There have been more significant efforts to filter out alarms from existing systems.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%