2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-16279-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrating molecular markers into metabolic models improves genomic selection for Arabidopsis growth

Abstract: The current trends of crop yield improvements are not expected to meet the projected rise in demand. Genomic selection uses molecular markers and machine learning to identify superior genotypes with improved traits, such as growth. Plant growth directly depends on rates of metabolic reactions which transform nutrients into the building blocks of biomass. Here, we predict growth of Arabidopsis thaliana accessions by employing genomic prediction of reaction rates estimated from accession-specific metabolic model… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
56
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(62 reference statements)
1
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, a high output and quick methods of efficiency are important factors to be taken into account. These should also possess high polymorphism and should have codominance inheritance for homo and hetero zygotes in segregating offspring and should be cost effective [93][94][95].…”
Section: Molecular Marker Assisted Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, a high output and quick methods of efficiency are important factors to be taken into account. These should also possess high polymorphism and should have codominance inheritance for homo and hetero zygotes in segregating offspring and should be cost effective [93][94][95].…”
Section: Molecular Marker Assisted Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with the previous selection methods that based on pedigree information and progeny testing, GS possesses the natural advantages that the phenotype and the genomic breeding values data can be obtained as soon as the descendant arrives, which dramatically accelerates the breeding process. A large number of researches have proved that GS facilitates the rapid selection of superior genotypes and accelerates genetic gain by shortening the breeding cycles (Bouquet & Juga, 2013; Crossa et al., 2017; Hayes et al., 2009; Nakaya & Isobe, 2012; Tong et al., 2020). After nearly two decades of studies on the GS methods, the prediction accuracy measured by the correlation between phenotype data and the predicted genomic breeding values has improved dramatically.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using expression compendia based on multiple experiments poses an interesting alternative, since genes with similar expression patterns are more likely functionally related, hence more likely involved in the same biological process(es) (Kourmpetis et al, 2011). Alternatives are to define phenotype associated genomic regions based on differential gene expression levels (Fang et al, 2017) or metabolite levels and metabolic fluxes (Tong et al, 2020), or to construct haplotypes in genic regions based on their ontology information (Gao et al, 2018). The GP requiring genomics inferred relationship matrices (GRM), e.g., GBLUP and its variants, can make use of information derived from these sources to construct a population variance-covariance structure (Zhang et al, 2010(Zhang et al, , 2011Fragomeni et al, 2017).…”
Section: Exploiting Biological Knowledge To Improve Genomic Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%