2020
DOI: 10.1007/s12652-020-02194-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrating HSICBFO and FWSMOTE algorithm-prediction through risk factors in cervical cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therapeutic SMOTE is a combination of therapy and smoothing therapy. The SMOTE algorithm firstly uses the CURE algorithm to cluster [ 14 ], adds a small number of samples to the original data, and then deletes the extractor. And it further generates noise and finally randomly generates new samples between the representative point and the center.…”
Section: Financial Loan Risk Prediction Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therapeutic SMOTE is a combination of therapy and smoothing therapy. The SMOTE algorithm firstly uses the CURE algorithm to cluster [ 14 ], adds a small number of samples to the original data, and then deletes the extractor. And it further generates noise and finally randomly generates new samples between the representative point and the center.…”
Section: Financial Loan Risk Prediction Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cancer cervix is evaluated using practical data mining algorithms. Geetha and Thangamani ( 37 ) addressed the imbalanced distribution of data and risk factors for cervical cancer diagnosis.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past three decades, multitude imputation approaches had been studied, range from statistical procedure to machine learning algorithms. The statistical procedure includes mean (10), mode and median (11), linear interpolation (12), regression (13) or by machine learning methods, such as K-nearest neighbors (14) (15), Fuzzy c-means (16), random forest (17), neural network (18), and decision trees (19). However, there is no solid conclusion in deciding which imputation model is the best because it depends on the type of data, missing proportion and also missing data mechanism (5).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%