2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnc.2020.125867
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrating habitat risk assessment and connectivity analysis in ranking habitat patches for conservation in protected areas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These small outcrops are essential, both because they represent exclusive habitats for endemic species (Hopper et al 2021) and because they contribute to connectivity, serving as connection points (i.e., stepping stones) for the ecological flow between areas (Chetkiewicz et al 2006). Thus, our results may also support conservation strategies based on studies involving spatial dynamics in plant populations and landscape ecology, including connectivity analysis (Salles et al 2019, Ghehi et al 2020.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…These small outcrops are essential, both because they represent exclusive habitats for endemic species (Hopper et al 2021) and because they contribute to connectivity, serving as connection points (i.e., stepping stones) for the ecological flow between areas (Chetkiewicz et al 2006). Thus, our results may also support conservation strategies based on studies involving spatial dynamics in plant populations and landscape ecology, including connectivity analysis (Salles et al 2019, Ghehi et al 2020.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Previous applications of the InVEST HRA leveraged diverse data sources and even used the tool in combination with other methodologies, e.g., ES and coastal zone management in Belize coast (Arkema et al, 2014); marine spatial planning in the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic Ocean regions in the United States (Wyatt et al, 2017); statistical analysis of ecology and conservation policies interactions in South Korea coastal area (Chung et al, 2015); InVEST HRA and coastal vulnerability models in Brazil (Elliff and Kikuchi, 2017); Marxan habitat prioritization software in California coastal area (Studwell et al, 2021); spatially explicit criteria based on marine biodiversity habitat suitability maps (Verutes et al, 2020) or habitat connectivity metrics in Iran inland (Ghehi et al, 2020). All these approaches confirm the diversity of options when applying the InVEST HRA tool.…”
Section: Extensions Of the Invest Hramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, the HRA model was run using the InVEST software version 3.9.0. The HRA model allows the assessment of the cumulative risk posed by anthropogenic activities to habitats and/or species as well as the consequences for the provision of ecosystem services and biodiversity (Cabral et al, 2014;Caro et al, 2020;Ghehi et al, 2020;Studwell et al, 2021). Table 2 presents the data requirements of the model and how they were generated and used.…”
Section: Identi Cation Of the Stressorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this study, the Euclidean risk equation with linear decay was used (see Eq.3). This approach combines the exposure and the response values to generate a risk value for each stressor-habitat combination in each grid cell (Ghehi et al, 2020). Euclidean risk calculation considers the risk to habitat j caused by stressor k in each location (cell precisely) and calculates it as the Euclidean distance from the origin in the exposure-consequence.…”
Section: Identi Cation Of the Stressorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation