Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences
DOI: 10.1109/hicss.2002.993906
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrating GSS and AHP: experiences from benchmarking of buyer-supplier relationships

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The MCDM method uses many techniques like Simple Average Weight (SAW), Analytical Network Process (ANP), Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), Technique for Order Performance by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA), Interruptive Structural Modeling (ISM), Hybrid approaches and VIKOR (ViseKriterijumskaOptimizacija I KompromisnoResenje in Serbian, meaning Multi-criteria Optimization and Compromise Solution). Peltola et al [17] used two decision support systems Graphic State Select (GSS) and AHP for improving the performance of buyer-supplier relationship. Yang et al [18] applied an integrated fuzzy MCDM technique for solving vendor selection problem.…”
Section: Multi Criteria Decision Making Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MCDM method uses many techniques like Simple Average Weight (SAW), Analytical Network Process (ANP), Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), Technique for Order Performance by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA), Interruptive Structural Modeling (ISM), Hybrid approaches and VIKOR (ViseKriterijumskaOptimizacija I KompromisnoResenje in Serbian, meaning Multi-criteria Optimization and Compromise Solution). Peltola et al [17] used two decision support systems Graphic State Select (GSS) and AHP for improving the performance of buyer-supplier relationship. Yang et al [18] applied an integrated fuzzy MCDM technique for solving vendor selection problem.…”
Section: Multi Criteria Decision Making Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Steps 1 and 2 are made on the basis of the decision maker's knowledge and understanding of the problem and steps 3 to 5 are executed using an appropriate software, such as the Expert Choice (Peltola, et al, 2002).…”
Section: Analytical Hierarchy Process (Ahp)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1) creating hierarchical tree, 2) pairwise comparing of research criteria and options, 3) operations for computing data, 4) sensitivity analysis, and 5) the level of non-adaptability (incompatibility), (D. Samari, et al, 2012). Steps 1 and 2 are made on the basis of the decision maker's knowledge and understanding of the problem and steps 3 to 5 are executed using an appropriate software, such as the Expert Choice (Peltola, et al, 2002).…”
Section: Analytical Hierarchy Process (Ahp)mentioning
confidence: 99%