2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2014.04.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrating geoarchaeology and magnetic susceptibility at three shell mounds: a pilot study from Mornington Island, Gulf of Carpentaria, Australia

Abstract: a b s t r a c tIn coastal areas of the globe, open shell matrix sites are commonly used to establish regional chronologies of human occupation and identify patterns of cultural change, particularly for the Holocene, postsea-level stabilisation period. Despite this, many basic sedimentary analyses that are routinely applied to rockshelter deposits (e.g. geophysical characterisation, particle size etc) are rarely applied to these sites. Magnetic susceptibility, occasionally used in rockshelters, has never been u… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This density is well within the parameters described for a naturally deposited assemblage, viz. >1000 foraminifera per 100 g of sediment (see Rosendahl et al, 2007Rosendahl et al, , 2014b. Five foraminifera taxa were identified, dominated by Elphidium sp.…”
Section: Re-analysis Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This density is well within the parameters described for a naturally deposited assemblage, viz. >1000 foraminifera per 100 g of sediment (see Rosendahl et al, 2007Rosendahl et al, , 2014b. Five foraminifera taxa were identified, dominated by Elphidium sp.…”
Section: Re-analysis Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Foraminiferal analysis was carried out on sediments from each excavation unit to assess the depositional context of deposits, with the exception of XU10 where no sediments were recovered (see Rosendahl et al, 2007Rosendahl et al, , 2014b. A sub-sample of the <2.3mm sediment sample was wet-sieved with freshwater through nested Endecotts sieves.…”
Section: Re-analysis Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Sediment magnetic susceptibility has also been widely adopted as a means to explore issues about depositional mechanisms and human occupation of rockshelter and cave sites (Ellwood et al 1997;Ellwood et al 2004;Herries 2006;Herries and Fisher 2010), yet few such studies have been completed on Australian sites (exceptions include Davidson et al 1993;Keys 2009;Marwick 2005;Rosendahl et al 2014). Magnetic susceptibility is a measure of the ease with which a material can be magnetized in the presence of a magnetic field (Thompson and Oldfield 1986, p. 25), and can be used to detect magnetic minerals present in sediments (Evans and Heller 2003).…”
Section: Integrated Approaches To the Study Of Sedimentation In Rocksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This means there are differences in the concentration of magnetic minerals within the deposits. On average, the upper deposits contain lower χfd%, and this could reflect younger soils (see Rosendahl et al 2014b). Cshell values suggest little interaction with terrestrial carbon sources, with carbonates being built primarily from marine reservoirs (see Petchey et al 2013).…”
Section: Magnetic Susceptibility Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%