2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.limno.2017.11.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrating genetics and morphometrics in species conservation—A case study on the stone crayfish, Austropotamobius torrentium

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
1
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For both mitochondrial genes, ranges of genetic distances between and within the phylogroups (Additional file 3 ) were in accordance with previously reported in Trontelj et al [ 3 ], Klobučar et al [ 4 ], Petrusek et al [ 27 ] and Berger et al [ 46 ]. Some of the observed ranges of the COI genetic distances between phylogroups were within the range of genetic distances found between Astacus species [ 3 , 47 ], Austropotamobius species [ 3 , 48 ] or Australian Parastacidae crayfish [ 49 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For both mitochondrial genes, ranges of genetic distances between and within the phylogroups (Additional file 3 ) were in accordance with previously reported in Trontelj et al [ 3 ], Klobučar et al [ 4 ], Petrusek et al [ 27 ] and Berger et al [ 46 ]. Some of the observed ranges of the COI genetic distances between phylogroups were within the range of genetic distances found between Astacus species [ 3 , 47 ], Austropotamobius species [ 3 , 48 ] or Australian Parastacidae crayfish [ 49 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Geographically and genetically isolated phylogroups represent the evolutionary legacy of A. torrentium which is highly relevant for conservation due to their mostly small distribution ranges and evolutionary distinctness. Since human mediated translocation and restocking of crayfish for repopulation are encouraged with the aim of increasing the genetic diversity of endangered populations [ 115 ], future conservation programs should consider conducting translocations and repopulations only within the same ESU [ 46 , 116 118 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different colour dots represent different phylogroups: green dots À Banovina (BAN), black dots À central and southeastern Europe (CSE), blue dots À Gorski Kotar (GK), purple dots À Lika and Dalmatia (LD), orange dots À Žumberak, Plitvice and Bjelolasica (ŽPB). 2012; Perry et al, 2013;Rudolph et al, 2016) or genetic background (Sint et al, 2007;Cataudella et al, 2010;Maguire et al, 2017;Pârvulescu, 2019) or probably combination of both (Baric et al, 2005a(Baric et al, , 2005bBertocchi et al et al, 2008;Mathews et al, 2008;Helms et al, 2015;Berger et al, 2017). Former molecular phylogenetic and phylogeographic research of the stone crayfish based on the mtDNA revealed existence of at least seven (Klobučar et al, 2013) or eight (Pârvulescu et al, 2019) highly divergent monophyletic phylogroups within A. torrentium, with the highest genetic diversity recorded in the north-central Dinarids in Croatia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, all of the measured morphometric characteristics were normalised by dividing their value with the corresponding postorbital length (POL = HEL þ ARL) to avoid comparison of different sized crayfish that could lead to false results (Chambers et al, 1979;Palma and Andrade, 2002;Sint et al, 2005). Since t-test showed that males and females differed significantly in characteristics describing claws and abdomen, the two sexes were analysed separately (Sint et al, 2007;Berger et al, 2017;Maguire et al, 2017;Vlach and Valdmanová, 2015). Observed differences are consequence of sexual dimorphism that is characteristic of crayfish and appears upon crayfish attein sexual maturity (Grandjean et al, 1997;Streissl and Hödl, 2002;Vlach and Valdmanová, 2015).…”
Section: Traditional Morphometric Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phylogeographic studies serve as a valuable tool in conservation biology [1][2][3][4], not only to help understand the evolutionary history of a species but for providing insight into a species' genetic diversity, which further enables proper assessment of the impact of various threats [5,6]. The use of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) has been applied in molecular analyses to aid conservation studies to investigate the genetic diversity and genetic structure of a species and identify any evolutionarily significant units [7][8][9][10][11][12]. Furthermore, phylogeographic studies are used to understand the role of paleogeographical events and demographic processes in shaping diversification within a species and the geographical distribution of the lineages [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%