2021
DOI: 10.1109/tmc.2019.2948641
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrating Fronthaul and Backhaul Networks: Transport Challenges and Feasibility Results

Abstract: In addition to CPRI, new functional splits have been defined in 5G creating diverse fronthaul transport bandwidth and latency requirements. These fronthaul requirements shall be fulfilled simultaneously together with the backhaul requirements by an integrated fronthaul and backhaul transport solution. In this paper, we analyze the technical challenges to achieve an integrated transport solution in 5G and propose specific solutions to address these challenges. These solutions have been implemented and verified … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(28 reference statements)
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, constraint ( 6) is used to bound the maximum computational capacity supported by the CU (κ 0 ). Constraint (7) guarantees that all the traffic served by a RRH, regardless of the slice to which the traffic belongs, equals the traffic forwarded over the paths from the CU to the RRH, as shown in (2). Constraint (8) states that the flow from each RRH r to CU is bounded by the capacity of the links of the paths, denoted as ω i,j (b/s).…”
Section: A Mip Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, constraint ( 6) is used to bound the maximum computational capacity supported by the CU (κ 0 ). Constraint (7) guarantees that all the traffic served by a RRH, regardless of the slice to which the traffic belongs, equals the traffic forwarded over the paths from the CU to the RRH, as shown in (2). Constraint (8) states that the flow from each RRH r to CU is bounded by the capacity of the links of the paths, denoted as ω i,j (b/s).…”
Section: A Mip Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once a RRH-user assignment is made by the algorithm, exact small-scale fading can be obtained online via pilot-based methods to enable the maximum ratio transmission beamforming by the RRHs. It is assumed the capacity of the backhaul and fronthaul links are large enough to support needed data flow of all scheduled users simultaneously [66]. Infinite buffer size is assumed for both RRHs and users.…”
Section: A Simulation Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors in [19] select splits to minimize inter-cell interference; [20] and [21] consider adaptive splits; [22] optimizes the splits for RAN slicing; and our previous work [7] optimized jointly the routing and splits. This is very important as vRANs use a shared packet-based network instead of dedicated CPRI links, and we refer the reader to our pertinent feasibility study [9]. The above works do not consider multiple CUs, nor the need to determine their location; yet, this is a key issue in vRAN design.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the CU-DU assignment decisions are affected by the functional split of each BS. While initially the vRAN fronthaul was designed using point-to-point connections, the new Xhaul architecture consists of heterogeneous packetswitched links that share multiple flows [9]. This approach is cost-effective, yet compounds the vRAN design problem as one has, additionally, to decide the routing paths.…”
Section: Introduction a Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%