DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-72667-8_44
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrating Folksonomies with the Semantic Web

Abstract: Abstract. While tags in collaborative tagging systems serve primarily an indexing purpose, facilitating search and navigation of resources, the use of the same tags by more than one individual can yield a collective classification schema. We present an approach for making explicit the semantics behind the tag space in social tagging systems, so that this collaborative organization can emerge in the form of groups of concepts and partial ontologies. This is achieved by using a combination of shallow pre-process… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
189
0
12

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 271 publications
(202 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(10 reference statements)
1
189
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…describing objects with keywords to enhance content retrieval, avoids the limitations known in ontology building as they allow the instant maintenance of tags. Statistical analysis of the large amount of data produced in tagging application can be used for ontology construction [5,6]. Additionally, Web resources, such as Google, Wikipedia, or Freebase, and terminological resources, such as Wordnet, will be exploited for ontology construction and background enrichment.…”
Section: Methodology and Contributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…describing objects with keywords to enhance content retrieval, avoids the limitations known in ontology building as they allow the instant maintenance of tags. Statistical analysis of the large amount of data produced in tagging application can be used for ontology construction [5,6]. Additionally, Web resources, such as Google, Wikipedia, or Freebase, and terminological resources, such as Wordnet, will be exploited for ontology construction and background enrichment.…”
Section: Methodology and Contributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such views are more succinct and informative than the original networks. It is for this reason that community detection has found applications in the field of recommendation systems [15][16][17][18], as well as for representing user profiles [19,20]. Other applications that make use of the knowledge extracted from tag communities include sense disambiguation [21] and ontology evolution/population [16].…”
Section: Community Trend and Event Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specia & Motta [33] present a combination of pre-processing strategies and statistical techniques together with knowledge provided by ontologies available on the Semantic Web to generate clusters of highly related tags that correspond to ontology concepts. As explained in subsequent sections, we shall also make use of tag processing and filtering techniques, similar to those presented in [33]. Angeletou [4] proposes a semantic enrichment of folksonomies by exploiting online ontologies, thesauri and other knowledge sources to make explicit the semantic relations between social tags.…”
Section: Categorisation Of Social Tagsmentioning
confidence: 99%