Proceedings. Fifth International Conference on Software Reuse (Cat. No.98TB100203)
DOI: 10.1109/icsr.1998.685732
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrating feature modeling with the RSEB

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
174
0
23

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 266 publications
(198 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
174
0
23
Order By: Relevance
“…Griss and colleagues have proposed integrating feature modeling as used in the FODA method into the Reuse-Driven Software Engineering Business (RSEB) method [15]. In the RSEB method, the domain is specified in the RSEB use-case model, which uses the standard methods for modeling relationships applying uses and extends relationships together with variation points among use cases 1 .…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Griss and colleagues have proposed integrating feature modeling as used in the FODA method into the Reuse-Driven Software Engineering Business (RSEB) method [15]. In the RSEB method, the domain is specified in the RSEB use-case model, which uses the standard methods for modeling relationships applying uses and extends relationships together with variation points among use cases 1 .…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FeatuRSEB is an extension of RSEB with an explicit domain analysis phase [12] based on FODA [16]. The feature model is used as a catalog of feature commonality and variability.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Separation is required both when the card is incorrect electronically (sub-feature DF e ) and in case of printing failure (sub-feature DF p ). (Griss et al, 1998;Svahnberg et al, 2002;van Gurp, 2003). A traditional feature tree allows for representing compositions of features, specialization (inheritance) relations on features as well as mutual dependencies between features.…”
Section: A Modular System For Production Of Electronic Cardsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it supports neither a proper overview of the requirements for the system under design (Felty and Namijoshi, 2003;Muller, 2004) nor a requirements reference model for configurable systems such as, for example, product lines. A possible alternative proposed in this area is a feature tree model (Griss et al, 1998;Svahnberg et al, 2002;van Gurp, 2003), which allows for a system's functional requirements to be gathered and presented in a compact and visualized form.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%