The two official measures of U.S. economic output, gross domestic product (GDP) and gross domestic income (GDI), have shown markedly different business cycle fluctuations over the past 25 years, with GDI showing a more pronounced cycle than GDP. This paper reports a broad range of results that indicate that GDI better reflects the business cycle fluctuations in true output growth. Results on revisions to the estimates, and correlations with numerous other cyclically sensitive variables, are particularly favorable to GDI. The most recent GDI data show the 2007-09 downturn to have been considerably worse than is reflected in GDP. 1. Online appendices for all papers in this issue may be found on the Brookings Papers webpage (www.brookings.edu/economics/bpea), under "Conferences and Papers." Source: Author's calculations using BEA data. a. "Initial" estimates are those in the third BEA release for each quarter. 4. This presentation was suggested to me by William Wascher. 5. The line plots the predicted values from regressing the 13 Q4-over-Q4 growth rates of real GDP(E) on a constant and the gap between the initial estimates of Q4-over-Q4 GDP(I) and GDP(E) growth. The coefficient on the gap is 0.98, with a standard error of 0.44 and an adjusted R 2 of 0.25. I also experimented with corrections that removed the effects of major methodological changes from the revisions; this modification increased the R 2 .