2004
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.622341
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrating Expenditure and Income Data: What to Do with the Statistical Discrepancy?

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(10 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…accounting balances, which may not be positive. In this case, |B j,t | should be considered instead of B j,t as the denominator in expression (11) (Beaulieu and Bartelsman (2004), Chen (2006) and Dagum and Cholette (2006), page 274):…”
Section: Two-step Reconciliation Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…accounting balances, which may not be positive. In this case, |B j,t | should be considered instead of B j,t as the denominator in expression (11) (Beaulieu and Bartelsman (2004), Chen (2006) and Dagum and Cholette (2006), page 274):…”
Section: Two-step Reconciliation Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that deriving (preliminary) reconciled estimates to start the algorithm may be an additional complication for practitioners, we view this feature as another clear advantage of the IP method. 5 The superscripts 'BB' and 'ST ' denote distinctive normalization factors of the squared differences at the numerator, as proposed byBeaulieu and Bartelsman (2004), andStuckey et al (2004), respectively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%