2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2003.11.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrating decision tools for the sustainable management of land contamination

Abstract: The approach to taking decisions on the management of land contamination has changed markedly over 30 years. Change has been rapid with policy makers and regulators, practitioners and researchers having to keep pace with new technologies, assessment criteria and diagnostic methods for their measurement, techniques for risk analysis and the frameworks that support decision-makers in their efforts to regenerate historically contaminated land. Having progressed from simple hazard assessment through to 'sustainabi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
44
0
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
44
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The present study makes an innovative contribution by classifying a large number of sustainability considerations and establishing structural relationships among stakeholder influence, institutional forces, and sustainable practices [21]. Decision support tools (DST) such as multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) have been recognized to play a vital and challenging role in the remediation of contaminated sites [22][23][24][25]. MCDA is an activity that helps making decisions mainly in terms of choosing, ranking or sorting the actions, and the primary goal of research in MCDA is to develop tools to help people to make more reasonable decisions [26].…”
Section: Literature Review and Theories Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present study makes an innovative contribution by classifying a large number of sustainability considerations and establishing structural relationships among stakeholder influence, institutional forces, and sustainable practices [21]. Decision support tools (DST) such as multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) have been recognized to play a vital and challenging role in the remediation of contaminated sites [22][23][24][25]. MCDA is an activity that helps making decisions mainly in terms of choosing, ranking or sorting the actions, and the primary goal of research in MCDA is to develop tools to help people to make more reasonable decisions [26].…”
Section: Literature Review and Theories Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…De uma abordagem centrada em custo em meados da década de 1970, tornou-se uma abordagem de estudos de viabilidade tecnológica em meados da década de 1980, seguida de uma abordagem baseada em risco em meados da década de 1990. Por sua vez, a partir de 2000 observa-se que as decisões ambientais devem ser socialmente robustas, em um contexto de desenvolvimento sustentável (Pollard et al, 2004).…”
Section: Sustentabilidade Em Remediaçãounclassified
“…Practitioners and decision makers can rely on a broad range of decision tools that can help them to achieve a better balance between economic, social and environmental health aspects of contaminated land remediation [27]. A holistic approach for the management of contaminated land should ideally include an assessment of the environmental risk of the contamination, an assessment of the environmental, social and health impact of the remediation process and a costbenefit analysis of the remediation project [27].…”
Section: Other Aspects Not or Only Partly Addressed In Lcamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A holistic approach for the management of contaminated land should ideally include an assessment of the environmental risk of the contamination, an assessment of the environmental, social and health impact of the remediation process and a costbenefit analysis of the remediation project [27].…”
Section: Other Aspects Not or Only Partly Addressed In Lcamentioning
confidence: 99%