2016
DOI: 10.1002/ece3.2390
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrating data‐deficient species in analyses of evolutionary history loss

Abstract: There is an increasing interest in measuring loss of phylogenetic diversity and evolutionary distinctiveness which together depict the evolutionary history of conservation interest. Those losses are assessed through the evolutionary relationships between species and species threat status or extinction probabilities. Yet, available information is not always sufficient to quantify the threat status of species that are then classified as data deficient. Data‐deficient species are a crucial issue as they cause inc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to the other components of the ICV, the results of species vulnerability revealed regional differences. Although most species were found to have low threat levels ( (Davidson et al 2009(Davidson et al , 2012, amphibians, reptiles (Veron et al 2016), and fish (Sunday et al 2015). In the ocean, range shifts have been faster than in terrestrial ecosystems (Pinsky et al 2013), and species with lower latitudinal ranges are more vulnerable because they become less able to find spots that fit their thermal preferences (Sunday et al 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to the other components of the ICV, the results of species vulnerability revealed regional differences. Although most species were found to have low threat levels ( (Davidson et al 2009(Davidson et al , 2012, amphibians, reptiles (Veron et al 2016), and fish (Sunday et al 2015). In the ocean, range shifts have been faster than in terrestrial ecosystems (Pinsky et al 2013), and species with lower latitudinal ranges are more vulnerable because they become less able to find spots that fit their thermal preferences (Sunday et al 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The critE EX mode makes use of extinction probabilities that are defined by the IUCN as one of several criteria for species assessments of threatened species. Although widely used in the scientific literature for modeling species' extinction risks (Veron et al 2016, Davis et al 2018, Cooke et al 2019, Oliveira et al 2019, these probabilities are not originally intended for this purpose and per definition only apply to the subset of threatened species that was assessed under criterion E (Akçakaya et al 2006). The simulated extinctions resulting from this approach are alarmingly high and the estimated extinction rates are in most cases more than an order of magnitude higher than those estimated with the empirical EX mode approach, even when accounting for PEX taxa in the latter approach.…”
Section: Comparing Approaches To Simulate Future Extinctionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• CR: 50% extinction probability within 10 years or 3 generations, whichever is longer (maximum 100 years) IUCN conservation status assessments have been used in numerous scientific studies to project future biodiversity loss (e.g. Ricciardi and Rasmussen 1999, Veron et al 2016, Davis et al 2018, Cooke et al 2019, Oliveira et al 2019. One critical challenge in this approach is to meaningfully transform the IUCN-defined conservation statuses into explicit extinction probabilities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Range-restriction is indeed a key factor of extinction risks. Many research found that low geographic range size was the main predictor of these risks and it is also one of the main factors of the threat status of species in the IUCN RedList (Rodrigues, Pilgrim, Lamoreux, Hoffmann, & Brooks, 2006;Bland, Collen, Orme, & Bielby, 2015;Veron et al, 2016). Like original species, range-restricted species provide unique functions in an ecosystem as well as unique services to humanity (David Mouillot, Graham, et al, 2013;Leitão et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%