2008
DOI: 10.1119/1.2837811
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrating computation into the undergraduate curriculum: A vision and guidelines for future developments

Abstract: There is substantial evidence of a need to make computation an integral part of the undergraduate physics curriculum. This need is consistent with data from surveys in both the academy and the workplace, and has been reinforced by two years of exploratory efforts by a group of physics faculty for whom computation is a special interest. We have examined past and current efforts at reform and a variety of strategic, organizational, and institutional issues involved in any attempt to broadly transform existing pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
(3 reference statements)
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the central importance of computation to physics research, and hence the need for appropriately trained students and professionals to perform it, it is perhaps surprising that computing is often only weakly integrated into the physics curriculum. Several approaches have been tried to remedy this [7]: At the largest scale, whole majors on Computational Science have been created [8]; courses [9] or sequences of courses [10,11] have been created within departments; computational projects and homework problems have also been integrated into existing courses and laboratories, both for majors [12] and at the introductory level [13,14]. Encouragingly, a largescale survey performed about a decade ago [15], showed widespread support for these efforts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the central importance of computation to physics research, and hence the need for appropriately trained students and professionals to perform it, it is perhaps surprising that computing is often only weakly integrated into the physics curriculum. Several approaches have been tried to remedy this [7]: At the largest scale, whole majors on Computational Science have been created [8]; courses [9] or sequences of courses [10,11] have been created within departments; computational projects and homework problems have also been integrated into existing courses and laboratories, both for majors [12] and at the introductory level [13,14]. Encouragingly, a largescale survey performed about a decade ago [15], showed widespread support for these efforts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Working to integrate computation into physics courses demands that we understand the nature of computational instruction including the current state of that instruction, what variations we observe in the implementation of computation, and what factors support or inhibit departments and faculty moving towards computational instruction. Chonacky and Winch conducted a survey of faculty over a decade ago [18,19]. The authors intended this survey to identify faculty early-adopters of computation, establish a detailed database of computational activities, confirm the importance attributed to computation in courses, and manifest how insular the beliefs that computation is important are within departments.…”
Section: Motivation and Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With advent of powerful computers as well as the development of high-level programming languages, we are capable of modeling phenomenon that a generation ago would have required sophisticated tools. And yet, many of our programs have not yet incorporated computation into the undergraduate experience [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%