Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Software and System Process 2013
DOI: 10.1145/2486046.2486071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrating collaborative requirements negotiation and prioritization processes: a match made in heaven

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 1). Furthermore, as the WinWin methodology is the methodology most commonly used for electronic requirements negotiations [15], we include decision support within the WinWin methodology [6,33]. Moreover, we compare IntelliReq [31], which provides dedicated group decision support in requirements negotiations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Table 1). Furthermore, as the WinWin methodology is the methodology most commonly used for electronic requirements negotiations [15], we include decision support within the WinWin methodology [6,33]. Moreover, we compare IntelliReq [31], which provides dedicated group decision support in requirements negotiations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the following, we will analyse in a scenario-based [17,32] comparison as to whether DynaDeS meets its design goals for requirements negotiations. DynaDeS will be compared with decision support based on the WinWin methodology [33] and IntelliReq [31].…”
Section: Scenario-based Comparison Of Dynamic Decision Support For Rementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nupul Kukreja et al [17], in this have proposed a prioritization methodology to prioritize requirements of system and software. This methodology is a two-step approach and is based on decision theoretic model using a prioritization algorithm called TOPSIS viz.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The author has also set the directions for future work which is to build a heuristic to bound the number of stakeholders to be preferred for assessment process. Naila Sharif et al [16], devised a new requirements prioritization technique called FuzzyHCV which is a hybrid of two domains (SE and Computational Intelligence). It is a fusion of two methodologies which are Hierarchical Cumulative Voting (HCV) and Fuzzy Expert System.…”
Section: B Requirements Prioritization Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%