Proceedings of the 27th Spring Conference on Computer Graphics 2011
DOI: 10.1145/2461217.2461234
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrating cluster formation and cluster evaluation in interactive visual analysis

Abstract: Cluster analysis is a popular method for data investigation where data items are structured into groups called clusters. This analysis involves two sequential steps, namely cluster formation and cluster evaluation. In this paper, we propose the tight integration of cluster formation and cluster evaluation in interactive visual analysis in order to overcome the challenges that relate to the black-box nature of clustering algorithms. We present our conceptual framework in the form of an interactive visual enviro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The basic assumption made by the authors of the papers in this category is that an interactive and collaborative process combining the strengths of both human and machine would yield better results than a process that is purely automated or purely manual. Several examples of improving the quality of the clustering results using different strategies are given in the works presented in Andrienko and Andrienko [4], Basu et al [15], Boudjeloud-Assala et al [19], Cao et al [24], Castellanos-Garzón et al [26], Choo et al [30], Dobrynin et al [38], Hadlak et al [50], Hoque and Carenini [53], Hu et al [55], Kumpf et al [64], Lai et al [66], Lee et al [67], Lei et al [68], MacInnes et al [72], Packer et al [79], Schreck et al [86], Srivastava et al [94], Turkay et al [99,101], Zhou et al [116].…”
Section: Improving the Clustering Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The basic assumption made by the authors of the papers in this category is that an interactive and collaborative process combining the strengths of both human and machine would yield better results than a process that is purely automated or purely manual. Several examples of improving the quality of the clustering results using different strategies are given in the works presented in Andrienko and Andrienko [4], Basu et al [15], Boudjeloud-Assala et al [19], Cao et al [24], Castellanos-Garzón et al [26], Choo et al [30], Dobrynin et al [38], Hadlak et al [50], Hoque and Carenini [53], Hu et al [55], Kumpf et al [64], Lai et al [66], Lee et al [67], Lei et al [68], MacInnes et al [72], Packer et al [79], Schreck et al [86], Srivastava et al [94], Turkay et al [99,101], Zhou et al [116].…”
Section: Improving the Clustering Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[51], [52], [53], [54], [55], [56] Groups & Classification [57] [58], [59] [60], [61], [62], [63], [64], [65], [66], [67], [68], [69], [70], [71], [72], [73], [74] [75], [76], [77], [78], [79], [80] Dependence & Prediction [81], [82], [46] [83], [84], [85], [86], [87], [88], [89] [90], [91], [92] being analyzed. The results are then presented to the user through different visual encodings that are often accompanied by interaction.…”
Section: Levels Of Integrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Turkay et al presents an interactive system that addresses both the generation and evaluation stages in a clustering process [79]. Another example is the iVisClassifier by Choo et al [80] where the authors improve classifitcation performance through interactive visualizations.…”
Section: Tight Integrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given a clean edge routing, ribbons make the distribution of records across different categories easy to follow and analyze. These techniques have been used extensively for subset comparison – for example, in CComViz [ZKG09], Matchmaker [LSP*10], Vis‐Bricks [LSS*11], and others [TPRH11].…”
Section: Related Work On Comparative Subset Visualizationmentioning
confidence: 99%