2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10270-015-0457-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrating business process simulation and information system simulation for performance prediction

Abstract: Business process (BP) designs and enterprise information system (IS) designs are often not well aligned. Missing alignment may result in performance problems at run-time, such as large process execution time or overloaded IS resources. The complex interrelations between BPs and ISs are not adequately understood and considered in development so far. Simulation is a promising approach to predict performance of both BP and IS designs. Based on prediction results, design alternatives can be compared and verified a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(81 reference statements)
0
10
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, they did not consider redesigning the process or organizational structure. In particular, even though most studies use the simulation techniques to more effectively predict the effects of process redesign [23,35,[45][46][47][48][49] and business analysts simulated redesigned processes to validate the processes and identify possible problems caused by the changes in process [10,23,24,47,50], existing methodologies do not consider business process and organizational structure comprehensively to redesign them.…”
Section: Evaluation and Redesign Methodology Of Business Process Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, they did not consider redesigning the process or organizational structure. In particular, even though most studies use the simulation techniques to more effectively predict the effects of process redesign [23,35,[45][46][47][48][49] and business analysts simulated redesigned processes to validate the processes and identify possible problems caused by the changes in process [10,23,24,47,50], existing methodologies do not consider business process and organizational structure comprehensively to redesign them.…”
Section: Evaluation and Redesign Methodology Of Business Process Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Esta investigación fue motivada por la identificación de inconvenientes en la gestión de la información en los procesos administrativos y de seguridad de las unidades militares de la Fuerza Aérea Ecuatoriana (FAE), especialmente, en lo que se refiere a la del talento humano, seguridad operacional y física. Estas debilidades tienen la capacidad potencial de afectar el Escuela de Postgrados Fuerza Aérea Colombiana las principales causas de los inconvenientes presentados en su desarrollo, obteniendo así información y un diagnóstico sobre el impacto en el rendimiento de la totalidad del subproceso bajo criterios, condiciones y demoras aleatorias similares a las observadas empíricamente, como una aproximación al entorno real para estimar el impacto en términos de optimización, con miras al rediseño de los procesos que serán automatizados (Heinrich et al, 2017).…”
Section: Descripción De La Metodologíaunclassified
“…In contrast, AcsALign works with de facto standard modeling languages to require low additional effort for organizations. The approach around IntBIIS (Heinrich et al, 2017) also addresses mutual dependencies between business processes and architecture but focuses on performance predictions rather than access control. (Ramadan et al, 2017) proposes an approach to align architecture models and business processes with regard to security policies.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%