2022
DOI: 10.36680/j.itcon.2022.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrating building and context information for automated zoning code checking: a review

Abstract: Interoperability approaches have attracted much attention in the AEC/FM industry with the increased interest in Building Information Modeling (BIM) studies since 2000’s. Especially, the integration of BIM with GIS is crucial for areas, which need detailed information on buildings and their surroundings. Automated code compliance checking against zoning codes is an area that requires both zoning data and building design data. In an ideal automated zoning code checking process, building codes should be retrieved… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
(96 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interviewees mentioned this inconsistency for example between the regulations of all the involved stakeholders to the guidelines and policies of the municipality Table 1. Challenges identified from the interviews Building permit process benchmarking automated code compliance checking (such as (Han et al, 1997;Pauwels et al, 2011;Dimyadi and Amor, 2013;Malsane et al, 2015;Preidel and Borrmann, 2016;Zhou and El-Gohary, 2016;Macit Ilal and Gunaydin, 2017;Kim et al, 2019;Temel and Basaga, 2020;Guo et al, 2021;_ Ilal and _ Ilal, 2022;Zhou et al, 2022;). Even when considering that code checking is an important part, it is just one step within the entire building permit process focusing only on a part of the content check within the review.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Interviewees mentioned this inconsistency for example between the regulations of all the involved stakeholders to the guidelines and policies of the municipality Table 1. Challenges identified from the interviews Building permit process benchmarking automated code compliance checking (such as (Han et al, 1997;Pauwels et al, 2011;Dimyadi and Amor, 2013;Malsane et al, 2015;Preidel and Borrmann, 2016;Zhou and El-Gohary, 2016;Macit Ilal and Gunaydin, 2017;Kim et al, 2019;Temel and Basaga, 2020;Guo et al, 2021;_ Ilal and _ Ilal, 2022;Zhou et al, 2022;). Even when considering that code checking is an important part, it is just one step within the entire building permit process focusing only on a part of the content check within the review.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, 2015; Preidel and Borrmann, 2016; Zhou and El-Gohary, 2016; Macit Ilal and Gunaydin, 2017; Kim et al. , 2019; Temel and Basaga, 2020; Guo et al ., 2021; İlal and İlal, 2022; Zhou et al. , 2022; Bloch et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The research conducted by Yogana and Latief [28] developed a WBS-based information system integrated with a BIM application to generate a BIM component for regulatory requirement verification. The research conducted by Altintas and Ilal [29] presented the opportunities that the integration of BIM and GIS could introduce to the field of automated zoning compliance assessment. However, the above works have not considered the quality and consistency of BIM data.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%