Integrating BON and Object-Z.

Paige, Richard F.; Brooke, Phillip J.

doi:10.5381/jot.2004.3.3.a3

Cited by 5 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In the same context, other UML diagrams have been considered [12,20]. On the other hand, Paige and Brooke presented in [28,29] a pragmatic approach integrating the object-oriented methodology BON (an alternative to UML) and the Object-Z language. The majority of these papers have focused on translating to a formal specification only one feature of objectoriented systems, whether static or dynamic.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 97%

Verifying UML Diagrams with Model Checking: A Rewriting Logic Based Approach

Mokhati

Gagnon

Badri

2007

Seventh International Conference on Quality Software (QSIC 2007)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We present, in this paper, a framework supporting a formal verification of UML diagrams using the Maude language. The approach considers both static and dynamic features of object-oriented systems. We focus, in particular, on UML class, state and communication diagrams. The formal and objectoriented language Maude, based on rewriting logic, supports formal specification and programming of concurrent systems, as well as model checking. The major motivations of this work are: (1) bind together the UML notation and the Maude language (2) preserve the coherence in object-oriented systems description, (3) use model checking techniques to support formally their verification process. The generated Maude specifications, from the considered UML diagrams, are validated by simulation and model checking. The approach is illustrated using a concrete case study.

show abstract

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 97%

Verifying UML Diagrams with Model Checking: A Rewriting Logic Based Approach

Mokhati

Gagnon

Badri

2007

Seventh International Conference on Quality Software (QSIC 2007)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In the same context, other UML diagrams have been considered [Dong00,MacColl99]. On the other hand, Paige and Brooke presented in [Paige04] a pragmatic approach integrating the object-oriented methodology BON (an alternative to UML) and the Object-Z language. Their approach was implemented using the BON-CASE tool [Paige02].…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In [Canals03], the authors present a tool, called NEPTUNE, which contains a module, called Checker, supporting the verification of UML models including some properties expressed using the OCL language. Furthermore, the tool BON-CASE [Paige02,Paige04] contains a reasoning engine which allows the verification of different properties, which is comparable to NEPTUNE. In [Chan98a,Chan98b], the authors used the RSML language (which is an alternative to UML to represent state charts) to formalize the TCAS II program (avionics anti collision software).…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Applying Model Checking to Concurrent UML Models.

Gagnon¹,

Mokhati²,

Badri³

2008

JOT

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We present, in this paper, a framework supporting a formal verification of concurrent UML models using the Maude language. We consider both static and dynamic features of concurrent object-oriented systems. We focus on UML class, state and communication diagrams. The formal and object-oriented language Maude, based on rewriting logic, supports formal specification and programming of concurrent systems, as well as model checking. The major motivations of this work are: (1) translating concurrent UML diagrams into a Maude formal specification and (2) applying model checking to the generated specifications. The approach is illustrated using a concrete case study.

show abstract