2015
DOI: 10.3390/en81012100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrating Auto-Associative Neural Networks with Hotelling T2 Control Charts for Wind Turbine Fault Detection

Abstract: This paper presents a novel methodology to detect a set of more suitable attributes that may potentially contribute to emerging faults of a wind turbine. The set of attributes were selected from one-year historical data for analysis. The methodology uses the k-means clustering method to process outlier data and verifies the clustering results by comparing quartiles of boxplots, and applies the auto-associative neural networks to implement the residual approach that transforms the data to be approximately norma… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(45 reference statements)
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly to the results for the other classifiers, we can observe that the AIR values were higher for the cases of ρ = 0.5 and ρ = 0.8. Types of Combination ρ = 0.2 ρ = 0.5 ρ = 0.8 C 5-1 56.67% 62.33% 61.83% C 59.67% 62.33% 58.00% C 61.67% 65.67% 53.50% C 58.83% 62.33% 58.33% C 60.50% 67.00% 56.67% C [5][6] 58.17% 67.67% 56.00% C [5][6][7] 58.33% 64.17% 73.50% C [5][6][7][8] 58.67% 65.50% 76.83% C [5][6][7][8][9] 57.17% 66.67% 76.83% C [5][6][7][8][9][10] 55.50% 63.67% 70.67% Table 9. MARS Identification results, AIR -MARS {null}, for ten combinations of faults of an MNP 9 .…”
Section: Mnp 5 Mnpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly to the results for the other classifiers, we can observe that the AIR values were higher for the cases of ρ = 0.5 and ρ = 0.8. Types of Combination ρ = 0.2 ρ = 0.5 ρ = 0.8 C 5-1 56.67% 62.33% 61.83% C 59.67% 62.33% 58.00% C 61.67% 65.67% 53.50% C 58.83% 62.33% 58.33% C 60.50% 67.00% 56.67% C [5][6] 58.17% 67.67% 56.00% C [5][6][7] 58.33% 64.17% 73.50% C [5][6][7][8] 58.67% 65.50% 76.83% C [5][6][7][8][9] 57.17% 66.67% 76.83% C [5][6][7][8][9][10] 55.50% 63.67% 70.67% Table 9. MARS Identification results, AIR -MARS {null}, for ten combinations of faults of an MNP 9 .…”
Section: Mnp 5 Mnpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(i) machine learning techniques and process control tools, i.e. the residual Hotelling T2 control chart [7], [8], are wisely combined; (ii) an innovative multivariate outliers removal (MOR) method, based on k-means clustering, is proposed and applied to eliminate the abnormal samples from training instances (the proposed MOR approach generalizes the procedures already presented in [4], [9]); (iii) the status of the components is monitored by means of an original probabilistic formula defining a Key Performance Indicator (KPI): warnings of different severity are triggered based on threshold crossing rules; (iv) the Plug and Play nature of the presented approach, i.e. the fast service scalability on wind farms of increasing size, is also an added value of this work; (v) the proposed systems was realised and tested on a large number of wind turbines in different farms and geographical areas, during three years of operation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SHM enables identifying and diagnosing the fault and its location by detecting changes in the static and dynamic features of the structure [9,10]. SHM can be remotely managed, reducing the costs of manual inspections and the time between the fault occurrences, and this has been noted [11,12]. This will lead to an increase in the productivity, reducing the potential downtimes for the wind farms and increasing the RAMS of the wind turbine [13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%