Integrating and Utilizing Citizen Biodiversity Data on the Web for Science: An Example of a Rare Triggerfish Hybrid Image Provided by a Sport Fisherman

Abstract

Murase, A.;Shiina, M.; Masui, R., and Senou, H., 2015. Integrating and utilizing citizen biodiversity data on the Web for science: An example of a rare triggerfish hybrid image provided by a sport fisherman.We report a photograph of the rare triggerfish hybrid, Rhinecanthus aculeatus 3 R. rectangulus (order Tetraodontiformes; family Balistidae), from Miyako-jima Island, Ryukyu Islands, southern Japan, that was provided by a sport fisherman via WEB sakana-zukan (an online photographic database of fish in Japan). The image was registered in the Fish Image Database of the Kanagawa Prefectural Museum of Natural History to make it available for scientific scrutiny. Here we emphasize the importance of communication between citizens, such as fishermen, scuba divers, and others, and experts via the Internet, to make possible the processing of biodiversity information provided by citizens into museum collections. This communication contributes Global Biodiversity Information Facility data for various biological studies, such as those on taxonomy, morphology, fauna/flora, community ecology, and biogeography. Serranidae Epinephelus bruneus Bloch, 1793 3 Epinephelus malabaricus (Bloch and Schneider, 1801) http://zukan.com/fish/internal957 4 Oplegnathidae Oplegnathus fasciatus (Temminck and Schlegel, 1844) 3 Oplegnathus punctatus (Temminck and Schlegel, 1844) http://zukan.com/fish/internal631 10 Pleuronectidae Kareius bicoloratus (Basilewsky, 1855) 3 Platichthys stellatus (Pallas, 1787) http://zukan.com/fish/internal629 7 Balistidae Rhinecanthus aculeatus (Linnaeus, 1758) 3 Rhinecanthus rectangulus (Bloch and Schneider, 1801)

Biodiversity data mining from Argus-eyed citizens: the first illegal introduction record of Lepomis macrochirus macrochirus Rafinesque, 1819 in Japan based on Twitter information

“…Web data mining has been rapidly developing over recent years, and its potential continues to expand ( Liu 2011 ). This report shows an example of web data mining in the discipline of Citizen Science, as similarly shown by Miyazaki et al (2015b) . It demonstrates the “accidental” crowdsourcing approach but not the “systematic” crowdsourcing approach such as iSpot ( Silvertown et al 2015 ).…”

How to Evaluate Woodcock Habitat Management: are Landowners the Answer?

“…Flexibility with data reporting methods also appeared important in our pilot project (Table 2). There are many benefits to using online databases in which landowners can enter their observations in a centralized location for storage, organization, analysis, and exploration (Newman et al 2010, Dickinson et al 2012, Miyazaki et al 2015. However, given the older age demographic of the landowners who may monitor woodcock, an option for returning hard-copy data seems necessary to accommodate all computer skill levels and those who may not have access to computers.…”

Fish rubbings, ‘gyotaku’, as a source of historical biodiversity data

“…Biodiversity observations have been made not only by researchers but also by citizens, even prior to the recent rise of citizen science projects (Miller-Rushing et al 2012;Kobori et al 2016). Although data mining from citizens' observation records is a legitimate method of citizen science (Fink and Hochachka 2012), limitations on data availability have not been well documented except for online data (e.g., Miyazaki et al 2015).…”