2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10040-017-1658-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrating an artificial intelligence approach with k-means clustering to model groundwater salinity: the case of Gaza coastal aquifer (Palestine)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of machine learning methods also has been limited in a few modeling experiments even though they appeared more convenient and performed with higher accuracy, better generalization ability, more reliability, and efficiency compared to the statistical, numerical, and physical models. For instance, Alagha et al [82] used artificial neural networks (ANNs) and support vector machine (SVM) to model salinization processes with higher performance and more simplicity compared to statistical methods. Yu et al [53] also reported machine learning models of back propagation ANN (BP-ANN) and neuro-fuzzy (NF) superior to the conventional linear models in the prediction of groundwater salinity hazards.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of machine learning methods also has been limited in a few modeling experiments even though they appeared more convenient and performed with higher accuracy, better generalization ability, more reliability, and efficiency compared to the statistical, numerical, and physical models. For instance, Alagha et al [82] used artificial neural networks (ANNs) and support vector machine (SVM) to model salinization processes with higher performance and more simplicity compared to statistical methods. Yu et al [53] also reported machine learning models of back propagation ANN (BP-ANN) and neuro-fuzzy (NF) superior to the conventional linear models in the prediction of groundwater salinity hazards.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They pointed out that the limited data set was one of the drawbacks of their research and encouraged others to collect more data to recalibrate and revalidate the model. Wang et al [19] employed a typical three-layer of MLP structure [77][78][79][80][81][82][83][84][85][86][87][88][89] with the BP algorithm to achieve Chl-a prediction. They divided the dataset into training (75%) and testing parts (25%).…”
Section: Artificial Neural Network Models For Water Quality Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, two studies have employed complex reactive transport models to quantify biogeochemical reactions induced by SWI [157][158][159]. Besides the physically based density dependent numerical models that need a large number of field data to be calibrated, there has recently been a growing number of papers that have employed the surrogate models, such as non-linear regressive techniques, to describe the SWI phenomenon [160][161][162][163][164], or using simple spreadsheet macros to plot the hydrochemical facies evolution [165]. In general, numerical models have been widely used to quantify the different origins of salinization via density dependent flow and transport models [166][167][168][169][170][171][172][173][174][175].…”
Section: Data Handling Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%