Integrating airline operational practices into passenger airline hub definition

Ryerson, Megan S.; Kim, Hyun

doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2013.05.013

Cited by 36 publications

(14 citation statements)

References 26 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Lin and Fu, 2014;Ryerson and Kim, 2013;Redondi et al, 2013)). Papers in this area often focus on network developments (see for example Neil, 2013 andBorodako andRudnicki, 2014;see Paez, 2004, for a study on accessibility in eastern Asia, combining the air and road networks).…”

Section: Air Transport Marginal Effects Multiple Optionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Accessible accessibility research challenges

Wee

2016

Journal of Transport Geography

272

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Accessibility is a key concept in the field of transport geography. There is a rich, though not very mature, body of literature on this topic which is largely application-driven. The focus in the literature is generally on methods and concept and/or on applications. Applications generally focus on ex ante or ex post evaluations of the implications for accessibility of (candidate) policy plans. An important question is which are the main challenges in the area of accessibility research? This paper aims to examine this question and provide a research agenda for the coming one or two decades or so. The focus is on putting relatively new topics on the agenda, rather than making suggestions for improvements of given accessibility indicators. The paper does not aim to provide a complete list, but rather proposes avenues for future research focusing on (1) indicators to express accessibility, and (2) evaluation. In the area of indicators the challenges include the impact of ICT on accessibility; the inclusion of the robustness of the transport system in indicators; comparing perceptions of accessibility and traditional accessibility indicators; the option value; and the indicators of accessibility for goods transport, air transport, and slow modes. In the area of evaluation the paper discusses the pros and cons of the logsum as an accessibility measure, ethical aspects, comparisons of accessibility indicators to evaluate a specific case, and the needs of the clients of accessibility research.

show abstract

Section: Air Transport Marginal Effects Multiple Optionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Accessible accessibility research challenges

Wee

2016

Journal of Transport Geography

272

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…As a result, passengers with different origins and destinations share some of the same fl ight segments, enabling airlines to use larger aircraft. Rather than operating a large number of small point-to-point fl ights, the airlines use hub-and-spoke networks to exploit aircraft cost economies of scale and economies of density (Nero, 1999;Ryerson & Hansen, 2013;Ryerson & Kim, 2013). 2.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Build Airport Capacity or Manage Flight Demand? How Regional Planners Can Lead American Aviation Into a New Frontier of Demand Management

Ryerson

Woodburn

2014

Journal of the American Planning Association

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…In the airline sector, most of the graph theory studies focus on airport properties. Ryerson and Kim (2013) present a methodology defining tiers for hubs. Grubesic et al (2008Grubesic et al ( , 2009 evaluate airport hierarchies across time according to passengers flows while Malighetti et al (2018) study European airport hierarchies according to freight flows.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Measuring the development of airline networks: Comprehensive indicators

Roucolle

Seregina

Urdanoz

2020

Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The literature on airlines presents few studies analyzing the airlines network evolution. We believe that this gap is due to the difficulty of capturing the network complexity in a simple manner. This paper proposes new simple and continuous indicators to measure the airlines' network structure. The methodology to build them is based on graph theory and principal component analysis. We apply this approach to the US domestic market for 2005-2018, and obtain three network indicators. The first one measures how close the network is to a single-center structure. The second indicator measures the airline's ability to provide alternative routes. The third indicator captures the network size. We analyze the indicators evolution across time and show their robustness under different scenarios.

show abstract

Integrating airline operational practices into passenger airline hub definition

Cited by 36 publications

References 26 publications

Accessible accessibility research challenges

Accessible accessibility research challenges

Build Airport Capacity or Manage Flight Demand? How Regional Planners Can Lead American Aviation Into a New Frontier of Demand Management

Measuring the development of airline networks: Comprehensive indicators

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About