The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2020
DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.563358
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrating Air Quality and Public Health Benefits in U.S. Decarbonization Strategies

Abstract: Research on air quality and human health "co-benefits" from climate mitigation strategies represents a growing area of policy-relevant scholarship. Compared to other aspects of climate and energy policy evaluation, however, there are still relatively few of these co-benefits analyses. This sparsity reflects a historical disconnect between research quantifying energy and climate, and research dealing with air quality and health. The air quality co-benefits of climate, clean energy, and transportation electrific… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
32
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 97 publications
(209 reference statements)
2
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A recent literature review in 2020, by Gallagher and Holloway, presents evidence from available studies, highlighting that GHG reduction has synergistic benefits of decreasing air pollution and protecting public health (Gallagher and Holloway, 2020). They note that "compared to other aspects of climate and energy policy evaluation, however, there are still relatively few of these cobenefits analyses".…”
Section: Co-benefits and Possible Tensions Of Decarbonization Of The Energy Sectormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent literature review in 2020, by Gallagher and Holloway, presents evidence from available studies, highlighting that GHG reduction has synergistic benefits of decreasing air pollution and protecting public health (Gallagher and Holloway, 2020). They note that "compared to other aspects of climate and energy policy evaluation, however, there are still relatively few of these cobenefits analyses".…”
Section: Co-benefits and Possible Tensions Of Decarbonization Of The Energy Sectormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other side, especially in low-income countries, the non-CO 2 climate-altering pollutants, also called "traditional air pollutants" [5] (e.g., Ozone (O 3 ), Sulfur Dioxide (SO 2 ), Nitrogen Oxide (NO x ), Nitrogen Dioxide (NO 2 ), Particulate Matter (PM), and Benzene), directly harm human health. According to Smith et al [6], two-fifths of the human population are subject to household air pollution due to inefficient and poor combustion of solid fuels used for cooking and heating.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Smith et al [6], two-fifths of the human population are subject to household air pollution due to inefficient and poor combustion of solid fuels used for cooking and heating. Gallagher and Holloway [5] point out that exposure to health-damaging air pollution is responsible for roughly 4.2 million deaths per year, being the largest environmental impact on human health. These impacts are mainly due to heart attacks, strokes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, lung cancer, and acute lower respiratory infections in children [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations