2012
DOI: 10.1177/003335491212700413
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrating Acute HIV Infection within Routine Public Health Surveillance Practices in New York City

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Patients were considered to have a “timely diagnosis” if the CD4+ T-cell count was ≥500/μL or if they had acute HIV infection at diagnosis. 18…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients were considered to have a “timely diagnosis” if the CD4+ T-cell count was ≥500/μL or if they had acute HIV infection at diagnosis. 18…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2008, the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene expanded their case definition to include acute HIV infection, initially defined as any person not previously reported to surveillance with an HIV RNA level greater than 5000 copies/mL and a negative screening test within one month or observed seroconversion over a one month period [ 11 , 13 ]. Over the last few years, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) also considered several revisions of the HIV surveillance case definition [ 14 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%