2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.pce.2008.02.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrated water management in shared water resources: The EU Water Framework Directive implementation in Greece

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the time of writing, the scholarly community has not taken many steps to look into the transboundary aspect of WFD implementation. We have 33 studies studying RBDs, a vast majority of those RBDs being transboundary, but only one study (Mylopoulos and Kolokytha 2008) addresses this issue by studying both sides of a Greek-Bulgarian basin. All other studies remain on "their" side of the river; Meyer and Thiel (2012), for instance, study the German part of the Odra basin and ignore the Polish part.…”
Section: Mapping Scholarly Interest: Countries Policy Levels Themesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the time of writing, the scholarly community has not taken many steps to look into the transboundary aspect of WFD implementation. We have 33 studies studying RBDs, a vast majority of those RBDs being transboundary, but only one study (Mylopoulos and Kolokytha 2008) addresses this issue by studying both sides of a Greek-Bulgarian basin. All other studies remain on "their" side of the river; Meyer and Thiel (2012), for instance, study the German part of the Odra basin and ignore the Polish part.…”
Section: Mapping Scholarly Interest: Countries Policy Levels Themesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a prominent example of integrated water policy, based on a river basin approach (Mylopoulos and Kolokytha, 2008) and it institutionalizes ecosystem-based objectives as the overriding criteria in water policy and decisionmaking, effectively formalizing the environment as a user of water and establishing it on an almost equal footing with other human economic activities (Kallis and Butler, 2001). Every river basin management plan must not only identify sources of surface water pollution, but must also review the impact of human activities, including growth and urbanization, on surface and ground waters, affecting land use and spatial development as well.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2, were determined as the fraction of deep infiltration of the precipitation, considering: (i) the Kessler method (1965) in areas of carbonate rock outcrops and (ii) the semi-empirical formulae of Coutagne (1954), Turc (1954) and Thornthwaite (1948), the latter combined with transient soil water balance/storage models, to calculate real evapotranspiration in areas of sedimentary deposits. During the implementation of regional flow models in the Algarve, the accuracy of these recharge estimates, first performed in the 1980s (Almeida, 1985) was improved, due to: i) the improved accuracy of the geometric representation of the lithological outcrops, based on more recent available information of geologic maps; ii) the improved accuracy and spatial resolution of rainfall, through the implementation of advanced methods, namely kriging with external drift on an orthogonal grid with a resolution of 1 km 2 , with elevation proving to be the most representative auxiliary variable (Nicolau, 2002). The new recharge estimates were validated with the FAO dual crop coefficient method (Allen et al, 1998), taking into account parameters such as daily precipitation, soil texture, moisture content and vegetation cover (Monteiro et al, 2007a;Mendes Oliveira et al, 2008) and resulting in a 3% higher estimated recharge.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…for integrated river basin management to simulate the economic impacts of policies in drought periods (Characklis et al, 1999;Booker et al, 2005), to quantify the economic value of stream flow (PulidoVelazquez et al, 2006(PulidoVelazquez et al, , 2008, for policy options and water allocation (Letcher et al, 2004), for trade-offs between competing uses (Burke et al, 2004), for analysis of the impact of climatic changes (Tanaka et al, 2006), and for trade-offs between efficiency, equity and sustainability in the design of water programs (Ward and Pulido-Velazquez, 2008). IWRM drives individual sectors to coordinate actions and collaborate with each other and enhances stakeholder participation, transparency and cost effective local management (Mylopoulos and Kolokytha, 2008). The objectives of IWRM for socio-economic development and sustainable development require the adoption of three key policy principles (Postel, 1992): i) equity, i.e., water is a basic need and no human can live without a minimum amount and quality;…”
Section: The Need Of Integrated Water Resources Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%