1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0043-1354(97)00440-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrated treatment of olive oil mill effluents (OME): Study of ozonation coupled with anaerobic digestion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
48
0
2

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
6
48
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In the previous few decades, the majority of the research conducted on OME treatment was focused on the use and development of anaerobic methods and bioreactors that can efficiently remove high organic loads [6][7][8][9]. The advantages of anaerobic digestion include low levels of biological sludge, high efficiency and the production of methane, which can be utilized as an energy source for on site heating and electricity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the previous few decades, the majority of the research conducted on OME treatment was focused on the use and development of anaerobic methods and bioreactors that can efficiently remove high organic loads [6][7][8][9]. The advantages of anaerobic digestion include low levels of biological sludge, high efficiency and the production of methane, which can be utilized as an energy source for on site heating and electricity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the high initial concentration of OMW and the slow removal kinetics of the refractory fraction of OMW pollutants combined with the fact that the refractory fraction also accounts for the colour of these effluents, makes OMW unsuitable for direct treatment by aerobic biological treatments (Niaounakis and Halvadakis 2004). Some physico-chemical pretreatments have therefore been investigated: Low-frequency ultrasound irradiation (Atanassova et al 2005) and ozonation (Andreozzi et al 1998;Beltran-Heredia et al 1999, 2000 both reduce the antioxidant activity of OMW by removing up to 50% of the phenolic compounds, hence facilitating the latter biological treatments. An alternative method for improving the performance of aerobic treatment of OMW is to mix it with municipal wastewaters.…”
Section: Biological Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Solely or combined with other methods (Konstas et al 1994;Andreozzi et al 1998;Sabbah et al 2004;Bertin et al 2004) it is increasingly being used to treat wastewaters, because it allows the recovery of an appreciable fraction of the chemical energy in the waste as methane and it produces much less waste sludge than aerobic processes (Dalis et al 1996;Erguder et al 2000). Due to its high organic content, OMW is suitable for anaerobic treatment, even if high purification efficiencies cannot be achieved (Dalis 1989;Dalis et al 1994;Beccari et al 1996).…”
Section: Anaerobic Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides these methods; advanced treatment processes such as ozonation [7]- [8]- [9], photocatalysis [10], electrocoagulation [5]- [11], fenton oxidation [12], ozone and fenton oxidation [13] and wet air oxidation [14] have been tested for olive mill wastewater treatment. However, these processes have a disadvantage of either high operating costs or high sludge quantities which requires additional treatment thereby additional investment and operating cost.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%