2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2023.107897
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrated transcriptomics and proteomics data analysis identifies CDH17 as a key cell surface target in colorectal cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 121 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CDH17 expression has been demonstrated in CRC human samples and can be used along with other markers, such as mucin 2 (MUC2) and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), to predict disease progression and prognosis in CRC patients [ 18 , 21 ]. To further confirm the expression of CDH17 in CRC, the RNA expression of CDH17 in colon adenocarcinoma (COAD) tissues was examined using data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Genotype Tissue Expression (GTEx) databases.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…CDH17 expression has been demonstrated in CRC human samples and can be used along with other markers, such as mucin 2 (MUC2) and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), to predict disease progression and prognosis in CRC patients [ 18 , 21 ]. To further confirm the expression of CDH17 in CRC, the RNA expression of CDH17 in colon adenocarcinoma (COAD) tissues was examined using data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Genotype Tissue Expression (GTEx) databases.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, high expression of CDH17 protein has also been observed in lung cancers [ 17 ]. CDH17 has become a popular target due to its frequent membrane surface expression on cancer cells and minimal expression in normal tissues [ 14 , 18 ]. A variety of therapeutic and imaging modalities targeting CDH17, such as monoclonal antibodies and their conjugates, as well as chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy, have been developed and tested in different preclinical settings [ 19 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this in silico study, through a sequence of impartial shortlisting and ranking methodologies, TM4SF4 was shortlisted and finally selected as an optimal cell surface therapeutic target for HCCs. Similar framework had previously been devised and implemented in other types of cancers, including colorectal cancer and diffuse large B cell lymphoma, to identify key cell surface targets in these malignancies [57], and transcriptomics as well as proteomics datasets have regularly been utilized to build algorithms for uncovering crucial biomarkers in cancers [87, 88]. TM4SF4 is not expressed in the critical tissues for survival including the brain, lung, heart and kidney tissues, while overexpressed in HCCs compared with matched and adjacent NTL cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following workflow for shortlisting and ranking procedures have previously been published [57] and adopted here for HCC with modifications. Within the longlist of 12,948 genes expressed in liver cancers defined by HPA, the following sequential shortlisting steps were conducted: (i) Shortlisting for genes not expressed in normal human brain tissues: This is required as cellular immunotherapy such as the approved anti-CD19 CAR T cells have been demonstrated to cause on-target, off-tumor neurotoxicity due to the presence of CD19 expression in brain tissues [5860].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the published analyses of DepMap CRISPR screen data have mostly been conducted on a pan‐cancer basis and offer limited guidance for pursuing therapeutic vulnerabilities and predictive biomarkers specific to individual cancer types. Furthermore, analyses of individual cancer types in DepMap to date have narrowly focused on features distinguishing a malignancy of interest from the pan cancer dataset [ 7 , 8 , 9 ], predetermined biological processes [ 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 ], or developing prognostic models [ 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%