2013
DOI: 10.1049/iet-cta.2011.0727
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrated trade‐off design of fault detection system for linear discrete time‐varying systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As mentioned in Section 1, the threshold ellipsoid determined by the shape matrix in the evaluation rule (16) can give more design freedom than the threshold scalar value in (11), and the rule (11) is actually equivalent to the rule (16) that adopts a threshold sphere with an appropriate radius. Considering that only the threshold value is used in residual evaluation of the integrated FD method [4,17], it motivated us to utilize the threshold ellipsoid-based evaluation rule (16) instead of the threshold value-based evaluation rule (11) in the integrated trade-off FD design to further reduce the conservativeness in the FD decision or equivalently enlarge the set of detectable sets with no need to scarify FAR. Note that other shapes can also be used as the threshold set.…”
Section: Motivation To Utilize the Set-membership Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…As mentioned in Section 1, the threshold ellipsoid determined by the shape matrix in the evaluation rule (16) can give more design freedom than the threshold scalar value in (11), and the rule (11) is actually equivalent to the rule (16) that adopts a threshold sphere with an appropriate radius. Considering that only the threshold value is used in residual evaluation of the integrated FD method [4,17], it motivated us to utilize the threshold ellipsoid-based evaluation rule (16) instead of the threshold value-based evaluation rule (11) in the integrated trade-off FD design to further reduce the conservativeness in the FD decision or equivalently enlarge the set of detectable sets with no need to scarify FAR. Note that other shapes can also be used as the threshold set.…”
Section: Motivation To Utilize the Set-membership Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the set-membership technique is introduced into the integrated FD design, the SDF, the FAR, and FDR given in [4,17] are redefined in the following based on the sets and the related measures of these sets.…”
Section: Set-membership-based Integrated Design Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations