Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2010
DOI: 10.2991/ijcis.2010.3.3.8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrated total cost and Tolerance Optimization with Genetic Algorithm

Abstract: The tolerance allocation problem has been studied in the literature for decades, usually using mathematical programming (or) heuristic optimization approaches. Elegant tools for minimum cost tolerance allocation have been developed over several decades but still there is no specified tool to find the total cost with respect to machining cost and asymmetric quality loss functions. Objective of this paper is to find the optimized total cost by considering the machining cost and the asymmetric quality loss of an … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, the roulette-wheel method of selection and the single-point method of crossover are applied to achieve the proposed procedure (Beasley and Chu, 1996;Kumar and Alagumurthi, 2010). In view of the fact that the number of '0' is more than '1' in a chromosome coded in our problem, this study constructs a special mutation operator to respond this situation.…”
Section: Genetic Operatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, the roulette-wheel method of selection and the single-point method of crossover are applied to achieve the proposed procedure (Beasley and Chu, 1996;Kumar and Alagumurthi, 2010). In view of the fact that the number of '0' is more than '1' in a chromosome coded in our problem, this study constructs a special mutation operator to respond this situation.…”
Section: Genetic Operatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is obvious that a trial and error approach does not ensure the convergence to optimal solutions. 19 In the recent years, several intelligent optimization algorithms have been used in different applications such as: (a) genetic algorithm (GA) in scheduling problem 21 , total cost and allocation problem 22 , obtaining the optimal rule set and the membership function for fuzzybased systems 23 , and facility location problem 24 , (b) ant colony optimization (ACO) in chaotic synchronization 25 and grouping machines and parts into cells 26 , (c) artificial immune method in several nonlinear systems 27 , (d) particle swarm optimization (PSO) in singleobjective and multi-objective problems 28,29 , bandwidth prediction 30 , parameter identification of chaotic systems 31 , QoS-aware web service selection in service oriented communication problem 32 , and solving multimodal problems 33 , (e) harmony search (HS) algorithm for synchronization of discrete-time chaotic systems 34 . Among the mentioned approaches, PSO which has been proposed by Kennedy and Eberhart 35 is inherently continuous and simulates the social behavior of a flock of birds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also a bio-inspired algorithm and is used to solve many optimization problems. 12,29,30 It starts searching with the initial population where individuals are distributed in the search space. It works by iterating the three operators that are selection, crossover and mutation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%