Integrated simulation for national development planning

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this papers is to highlight the applicability of integrated simulation models for national development planning to different issues and contexts. Specifically, the authors describe one such model, the Millennium Institute’s T21 model, which is used to support planning in various countries, and explore in detail the case of Swaziland to demonstrate the model’s usefulness at different levels in the planning process. Design/methodology/approach Integrated sustainable development planning models using the system dynamics (SD) modeling method have been designed to help overcome these obstacles and support decision-makers in the assessment of alternative policies. Such models are laboratory replicas of the critical mechanisms driving development in a country while being grounded in the historical data available. They can be used to perform simulation-based policy experiments that are otherwise impossible in the real world. Findings The proposed approach has facilitated the reporting on the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), as well as on the cross-sector long-term ex ante evaluation of the country’s “Economic Recovery Strategy” and a proposed “Fiscal Adjustment” policy. These assessments provided essential information for improving the quality of the decisions made. Such information cannot be obtained by the application of purely economic models or sectoral tools, that are not including the fundamental feedback structures that shape development in the long run and determine its sustainability. Research limitations/implications The new generation of global long-term Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) covers a far broader range of issues and indicators than the MDGs. The T21-Swaziland model only offers a limited subset of such issues, and future research will focus on achievements and challenges in expanding its scope to encompass the SDGs. Practical implications The T21 model has become one of the fundamental planning instruments of the country, and it has been used to evaluate national planning documents and other suggested strategies with respect to whether they are sufficient for reaching the long-term goals. Such information is then used as a basis for revision of development plans and adoption or rejection of suggested policy packages. Originality/value The MDGs (and their expanded follow-up, the SDGs) have been important step toward better governance, as they quantify key indicators of development and thereby allow for an evaluation of the degree to which these quantified aspirations are actually achieved. In addition to such hind-sight evaluations, ex ante evaluations are equally important for improvement of the quality of the decisions made. The authors propose and test a tool to support such type of evaluation, supporting integrated planning and model-based governance.

A Systems-Based Framework for Immunisation System Design: Six Loops, Three Flows, Two Paradigms

“…This broadened perspective was not addressed in this study. The integration of family planning and immunisation in one single model is a future research direction by which we want to understand the levels at which sustainable scenarios for a population health status can be obtained and if these levels are consistent with the findings of an existing socio-economic planning model such as the T21 model (Pedercini, Kleemann, Dlamini, Dlamini, & Kopainsky, 2019).…”

Anti-poverty policies analysis for rural households in Iran: a system dynamics approach

“…It can provide policy integration in which considered different aspects of sustainable development goals. Therefore the number of applications of system dynamics models are increasing (Pedercini et al, 2018;Dabestani et al, 2016;Zarei Mahmoudabadi et al, 2016).…”

Participatory pathways to the Sustainable Development Goals: inviting divergent perspectives through a cross-scale systems approach

“…While there are many ways of integrating, including e.g. rating connections (Nilsson et al 2016, using cross-impact matrices (Weitz et al 2018), and tracing and quantifying causal connections across policies and targets (Collste et al 2017, Pedercini et al 2018, few take the systems perspective needed to grasp the transformation of domains and dimensions of sustainability that we are arguing for. To grasp the complexity of transformations, there is a need to dive deep into the current challenges, their underlying causes and transformations already going on (van der Leeuw 2019b).…”