Integrated Seismic Survey for Detecting Landslide Effects on High Speed Rail Line at Istanbul–Turkey

Grit, Mert; Kanlı, Ali Ismet

doi:10.1515/geo-2016-0017

Cited by 10 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Typically, in shallow seismic investigations, particularly landslide studies, the natural frequency used is 4.5 Hz (Capizzi and Martorana, 2014;Glade et al, 2005;Havenith et al, 2002;Havenith et al, 2000;Imani, 2020;Imani and Tian, 2018;Imani et al, 2021b;Jongmans et al, 2009;Karslı et al, 2017;Kim et al, 2011;Uhlemann et al, 2016;Vanlı Senkaya et al, 2019). However, geophones with higher frequencies (10, 14, and 28 Hz) are likely applied in sliding studies (Adamczyk et al, 2013;Bekler et al, 2011;Donohue et al, 2012;Glade et al, 2005;Godio et al, 2006;Grit and Kanli, 2016;Jacob et al, 2018;Mezerreg et al, 2019;Ng et al, 2015;Travelletti et al, 2010;Wang et al, 2016;Zainal Abidin et al, 2012). Since the reliability of the refraction results depends on the accuracy of the picking first break, the first onsets should be recognizable.…”

Section: Data Acquisitionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The 2D and 3D images appeared through a strategy survey and inversion process (Bogoslovsky and Ogilvy, 1977). Despite the three-dimensional nature of landslides, there are very few studies that applied the 3D SRT survey (Heincke et al, 2010) in landslide studies, while the 2D SRT survey is more attractive to use in characterizing rotational/translational slide types (Armstrong et al, 2011;Capizzi and Martorana, 2014;Göktürkler et al, 2008;Grit and Kanli, 2016), flow and slide typology (Samyn et al, 2012;Travelletti et al, 2010), creep (Zainal Abidin et al, 2012, complex (Jongmans et al, 2009), rockslide (Havenith et al, 2002), unstable slope (Otto and Sass, 2006), debris flow, and soil slide (Imani and Tian, 2018;Imani et al, 2021b).…”

Section: Based Onmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The application of near-surface geophysical techniques has extensively increased. These methods can give reliable results obtained from the slope with a non-invasive, quick, and user-friendly technology (Al-Saigh and Al-Dabbagh, 2010;Bekler et al, 2011;Bichler et al, 2004;Capizzi and Martorana, 2014;Chen et al, 2019b;Donohue et al, 2012;Ferrucci et al, 2000;Göktürkler et al, 2008;Grit and Kanli, 2016;Havenith et al, 2002;Havenith et al, 2000;Imani et al, 2021a;Imani et al, 2021b;Jacob et al, 2018;Jongmans et al, 2009;Jongmans and Garambois, 2007;Karslı et al, 2017;Kim et al, 2011;Kul Yahşi and Ersoy, 2018;Mauritsch et al, 2000;Mezerreg et al, 2019;Ng et al, 2015;Nwankwo and Ugbena, 2019;Otto and Sass, 2006;Ozcep et al, 2012;Samyn et al, 2012;Solberg et al, 2012;Tomás et al, 2018;Travelletti et al, 2010;Wang et al, 2016;Yilmaz and Kamaci, 2018).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Landslide Investigation Using Seismic Refraction Tomography Method: A Review

Imani

El-Raouf

Tian

2021

Annals of Geophysics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Since the early 1960s, near-surface seismic refraction tomography (SRT) has been extensively used as a non-invasive and cost-effective geophysical method to characterize complex geological structures for landslide investigation. This geophysical technique is able to characterize the slope material, the sliding surface's geometry, the landslide mass movement, the physical properties of media, and the water saturation effects on the slope. Therefore, this method has become an appropriate method due to the increasing progress of novel algorithms and the improvements of field-data collection systems. In this paper, we attempt to review the essential research that investigated various types of landslides influenced by water saturation and landslide materials and identified in various areas, since the year 2000. Significant conclusions obtained by applying different survey strategies and data processing algorithms in seismic refraction surveys are widely discussed concentrating on the advantages and disadvantages of this method. The main results obtained by the few available studies applying time-lapse SRT (TLSRT) are particularly analyzed.

show abstract

Section: Data Acquisitionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Based Onmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Landslide Investigation Using Seismic Refraction Tomography Method: A Review

Imani

El-Raouf

Tian

2021

Annals of Geophysics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Likewise, there are numerous successful utilizations of the MASW method in the field of geotechnical engineering and environmental studies (Miller et al, 2003;Ivanov et al, 2006;Lane, 2009;Uhlemann et al, 2016;Su et al, 2017;Tábořík et al, 2017). Along with single applications, there are many case studies where joint geophysical techniques have been adopted (e.g., Refraction, Reflection/MASW, and ERT) for the analysis of landslides (Bichler et al, 2000;Grit and Kanli, 2016).…”

Section: Study Areamentioning

confidence: 99%

Characterization of Sobradinho landslide in fluvial valley using MASW and ERT methods

Hussain

Omar²,

Cárdenas‐Soto

et al. 2020

REM, Int. Eng. J.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Landslides can substantially impact the fluvial systems, which is why the continuous mapping of their extent, evolution and stability assessment is crucial. However, in such environments, material identification (e.g. colluvium) and subsurface characterization by the methods used for geologic mapping and geotechnical investigation is often a challenging task. Thus, these classical invasive methods may benefit from geophysical techniques to enable and enhance our understanding of the subsurface in these areas. To examine such integrated approach, Multi-Channel Analysis of Surface Waves (MASW) combined with Electrical Resistivity Tomography (ERT) were applied on a geomorphologically active fluvial valley in Sobradinho (the Federal District of Brazil). The subsurface materials showed a specific range of resistivity values as dry soil, saprolite, and landslide slip surface. The 1D shear wave velocity (Vs) model showed an increasing trend of Vs with depth at a location away from the landslide mass, while the longitudinal profile (over the landslide) showed an anomalous change in Vs (~ 250 to 400 m/sec). Based on the existing information about the landslide, the ERT appeared to be an effective method over MASW. This study shows how the integration of geophysical data with the geological and geotechnical investigation helps to obtain a more realistic or unambiguous model of the subsurface.

show abstract

“…Geophysical subsurface characterization of slopes prone to mass movements has an important meaning in landslide hazard evaluation (Mc Cann and Forster 1990;Caris and Van Asch 1991;Bogoslovsky and Ogilvy 1977;Jongmans and Garambois 2007;Pilecki 2017;Whiteley et al 2019). Active seismic methods are commonly used on landslides, mainly P-wave refraction (Grandjean 2006;Samyn et al 2012;Grit and Kanli 2016;Uhlemann et al 2016;Huntley et al 2019;Whiteley et al 2019), multichannel analysis of surface waves (MASW) (Kanli 2010;Grit and Kanli 2016;Huntley et al 2019;Whiteley et al 2019) and rarely S-wave refraction (Bièvre et al 2012;Uhlemann et al 2016;Whiteley et al 2019). In recent years, several applications of seismic interferometry (SI) with ambient noise have also been used on landslides (Jongmans et al 2009;Renalier et al 2010a, b;Mainsant et al 2012;Pilz et al 2013;Larose et al 2015;Harba and Pilecki 2017;Hussain et al 2017;Whiteley et al 2019).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of MASW and seismic interferometry with use of ambient noise for estimation of S-wave velocity field in landslide subsurface

2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study presents a comparison of data acquisition, processing and interpretation between passive seismic interferometry (SI) and active multichannel analysis of surface waves (MASW) methods, both using surface waves for estimation S-wave velocity field. Measurements have been taken in the same geological engineering conditions on Just-Tegoborze landslide on the south of Poland. This comparison study has an important meaning from landslide hazard evaluation point of view. The landslide is located in Magura Nappe in Outer (Flysch) Carpathians. SI was based on registration of local seismic noise generated by high traffic on the state road which intersects the landslide. The main processing step was cross-correlation of seismic noise between every pair of receivers. It led to obtain series of empirical Green's functions for Rayleigh surface wave. However, in MASW method, seismic energy was released by an impact of 5 kg sledgehammer in a metal plate. Both methods included analysis of dispersion curves of Rayleigh surface wave. The inversion of picked fundamental modes was applied using genetic algorithm and resulted in 1D S-wave velocity models. The last step of interpretation included model visualization as the 2D S-wave velocity sections for studied profiles. Both MASW and SI methods allowed to estimate S-wave velocity field in Just-Tegoborze landslide subsurface. Dispersion images obtained from both methods provided similar phase velocity and frequency ranges. On S-wave velocity sections, the greater depth range was observed for SI method; however, lateral resolution was better for MASW. Slip surfaces in colluvial layer were not observed on either SI or MASW S-wave velocity sections. Only results obtained from SI allowed to distinguish probable slip surface located deeper, i.e. on the contact with less weathered flysch bedrock.

show abstract

Integrated Seismic Survey for Detecting Landslide Effects on High Speed Rail Line at Istanbul–Turkey

Cited by 10 publications

References 17 publications

Landslide Investigation Using Seismic Refraction Tomography Method: A Review

Landslide Investigation Using Seismic Refraction Tomography Method: A Review

Characterization of Sobradinho landslide in fluvial valley using MASW and ERT methods

Comparison of MASW and seismic interferometry with use of ambient noise for estimation of S-wave velocity field in landslide subsurface

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About