2001
DOI: 10.1109/59.918289
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrated risk management of hydro power scheduling and contract management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
63
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During the course of the algorithm, when cuts are added, we record a set of cuts for each state in the Markov chain instead of just one for the stage. A similar approach has been described by [14] in the context of modelling uncertainty in the objective function (e.g. from electricity prices) as well as in the constraint right-hand sides.…”
Section: Markov Process In the Sddp Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the course of the algorithm, when cuts are added, we record a set of cuts for each state in the Markov chain instead of just one for the stage. A similar approach has been described by [14] in the context of modelling uncertainty in the objective function (e.g. from electricity prices) as well as in the constraint right-hand sides.…”
Section: Markov Process In the Sddp Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another explanation is that the objective function used in the Driva Kraftverk's production planning is such that the optimal production strategy is not a bang-bang strategy. The current industry practice seems to be towards using risk aversive objectives which have different target levels for earnings and where different target levels are progressively penalized (see, e.g., Fleten et al 2002 andMo et al 2001). A nonlinear power production as a function of the water level (η depending on the water level) also gives production strategies which are not bang-bang.…”
Section: Earnings and The Realized Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many times hydropower production models have also a "legacy" term in the objective function giving the value of the reservoir at the end of the planning period as a function of water level ( ) x τ (see, e.g., Fleten et al 2002 andMo et al 2001). Due to a technical reason that will be clarified after Lemma 1 we omit this term in our model.…”
Section: U T I X T T U T X X T T U T X Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations