2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.omtn.2023.06.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrated multiomics analysis and machine learning refine molecular subtypes and prognosis for muscle-invasive urothelial cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to prevent unsuitable model approaches owing to personal preferences, we combined 10 machine learning algorithms into 88 combinations and chose the best model. This combined ML model approach has been used to predict the prognosis of bladder cancer [ 41 ], muscle-invasive urothelial cancer [ 42 ], pancreatic cancer [ 29 ], and endometrial cancer [ 43 ], as well as validated in multiple datasets with good robust and AUC values. Importantly, the optimal model demonstrated strong and stable prediction performance by evaluating the C-index, IBS, and mean MSE.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to prevent unsuitable model approaches owing to personal preferences, we combined 10 machine learning algorithms into 88 combinations and chose the best model. This combined ML model approach has been used to predict the prognosis of bladder cancer [ 41 ], muscle-invasive urothelial cancer [ 42 ], pancreatic cancer [ 29 ], and endometrial cancer [ 43 ], as well as validated in multiple datasets with good robust and AUC values. Importantly, the optimal model demonstrated strong and stable prediction performance by evaluating the C-index, IBS, and mean MSE.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Enrichment scores for these gene sets were computed using the GSVA package, which allowed us to assess the level of activity of these genes in the context of chromatin remodelling. Additionally, we evaluated the GSVA scores for three gene sets related to treatment response, which were also gathered from the literature 29 . The ComplexHeatmap package was utilised to visualise these scores in a heatmap format, providing insights into the potential treatment responsiveness and malignancy of the subgroups.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, we evaluated the GSVA scores for three gene sets related to treatment response, which were also gathered from the literature. 29 The ComplexHeatmap package was utilised to visualise these scores in a heatmap format, providing insights into the potential treatment responsiveness and malignancy of the subgroups.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, we collected complete information from four HCC cohorts as the validation set, including three from the Gene Expression Omnibus (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo; GSE76427, GSE14520, GSE54236), and one from the International Cancer Genome Consortium (https://dcc.icgc.org/; ICGC_LIRI). Subsequently, we employed the limma package to perform background correction, log2 transformation, and quantile normalization on the data (21). To evaluate the homogeneity of the distribution of expression levels among samples, box plots were utilized as a visualization tool.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A lower IC50 value implies greater sample sensitivity to the drug under consideration. The drugs sensitivity prediction of CMOIC subtype were based on public databases CTRP2.0 and CTRP2.0, which include sensitivity data for 481 and 1448 compounds, respectively (21). The Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was calculated to assess drug sensitivity in these two datasets, and a lower AUC value indicates increased sensitivity to treatment.…”
Section: Screening For Sensitive Drugsmentioning
confidence: 99%