2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.11.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrated methods for determining restoration priorities of coal mining subsidence areas based on green infrastructure: –A case study in the Xuzhou urban area, of China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
10
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…For prioritization, all the collected information on environmental stratification and habitat and landscape condition was capitalized by means of an additive assessment, as already experimented but with different criteria and for different landscape contexts [68,69]. Accordingly, conservation and restoration measures were not only defined on the basis of connectivity metrics, but also differentiated accounting for the conservation status of the EUNs (i.e., the varying fragmentation degree due to differences in environmental suitability for intensive land uses), the naturalness of the occurring elements (avoiding a GI design just based on structural land cover information), and the current availability of ecological corridors for target species (in both structural and functional terms).…”
Section: Strength and Weakness Of Prioritization Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For prioritization, all the collected information on environmental stratification and habitat and landscape condition was capitalized by means of an additive assessment, as already experimented but with different criteria and for different landscape contexts [68,69]. Accordingly, conservation and restoration measures were not only defined on the basis of connectivity metrics, but also differentiated accounting for the conservation status of the EUNs (i.e., the varying fragmentation degree due to differences in environmental suitability for intensive land uses), the naturalness of the occurring elements (avoiding a GI design just based on structural land cover information), and the current availability of ecological corridors for target species (in both structural and functional terms).…”
Section: Strength and Weakness Of Prioritization Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From 2010, Jiawang District began to carry out land reclamation and ecological restoration projects in the coal mining area. As China's first wetland park developed through the land reclamation and ecological restoration of a coal mine subsidence area, the Pan'an Lake wetland has been constructed following a four-pronged model integrating "basic farmland rectification, coal mining subsidence reclamation, ecological environment restoration and wetland landscape development", and the constructed wetland covers roughly 10 square kilometres [39,40]. Through land reclamation and ecological restoration, landscape patterns and ecological environments in the mining subsidence area have changed, and ecological functions such as those of atmospheric regulation, water conservation, entertainment, waste treatment, food production and biodiversity protection are improving [18].…”
Section: Changes In the Ecological Environment Before And After Subsimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tool's cell removal rules are based on core-area zonation for emphasizing rare features, additive benefit function for selecting richer areas, or target-based planning for specifying specific conservation targets for each feature. The algorithm Table 1 Approaches used in the 7 case-studies identifying GI with all three pillars Article Hermoso et al [67] Capotorti et al [27] Lanzas et al [86] Capotorti et al [28] Hu et al [68] Cannas et al [25] Liquete et al [92] Information on the study The table lists the scale of the study, the resolution of the resulting maps, the approach used to compile the pillars into a final GI map, the type of data and methods used for the assessment of each pillar, as well as the surrogates used Capotorti et al [27] Lanzas et al [86] Capotorti et al [28] Hu et al [68] Cannas et al [25] Liquete et al [92] Structure and connectivity pillar uses accelerated stepwise heuristic, which starts from the whole landscape and iteratively removes cells with the smallest marginal loss over the total conservation value [108]. Zonation can also account for corridors using an additive penalty method in spatial priority ranking.…”
Section: Box 1: Spatial Conservation Prioritization and Its Benefitsmentioning
confidence: 99%