2008
DOI: 10.2501/s0021849908080513
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrated Marketing Communications: Practice Leads Theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
72
0
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
72
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…These five descriptions were taken from the work of Kitchen and colleagues on the views of practitioners on IMC (Kitchen et al, 2004(Kitchen et al, /2008. The results, presented in Table 2, confirmed their understanding of it being about coordination and unification of different types of marketing communication messages to consumers with most clients linking it closely with brand strategy but more reluctant to suggest it has a great influence on the business overall.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 53%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…These five descriptions were taken from the work of Kitchen and colleagues on the views of practitioners on IMC (Kitchen et al, 2004(Kitchen et al, /2008. The results, presented in Table 2, confirmed their understanding of it being about coordination and unification of different types of marketing communication messages to consumers with most clients linking it closely with brand strategy but more reluctant to suggest it has a great influence on the business overall.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 53%
“…The studies by Kitchen et al (2004Kitchen et al ( , 2008 on the agency viewpoint concludes that agencies can help and encourage with a 'bottom up' approach but it ultimately comes down to the client. It would seem from these results that clients generally agree with that, because of the need to implement IMC across the whole organisation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Events are delivered by a proliferation of individuals and teams throughout the organisation, and of course external agencies, each with their own structures, processes, priorities, and (perhaps) interpretation of the brand. This point is debated by Kitchen et al (2009) who reflects on the conflict that occurs within this environment and the damaging impact this can have on achieving a broad range of strategic outcomes from the activity. This can have the impact of diluting the marketing benefit that can be leveraged from these events.…”
Section: Marketing Event Landscapementioning
confidence: 99%