1998
DOI: 10.1007/s001220050907
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrated map of AFLP, SSLP and RFLP markers using a recombinant inbred population of rice (Oryza sativa L.)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
49
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
49
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A number of markers were identified that are closely linked to fgr (Ahn et al, 1992;Causse et al, 1994;Chen et al, 1997;Cho et al, 1998;Jin et al, 2003). Two restriction fragment length polymorphism markers, RG1 and RG28, were identified that flank fgr, with the estimates of genetic distances ranging from 10 centimorgan (cM) (Causse et al, 1994) to 12 cM (Lorieux et al, 1996) to 25.5 cM (Cho et al, 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A number of markers were identified that are closely linked to fgr (Ahn et al, 1992;Causse et al, 1994;Chen et al, 1997;Cho et al, 1998;Jin et al, 2003). Two restriction fragment length polymorphism markers, RG1 and RG28, were identified that flank fgr, with the estimates of genetic distances ranging from 10 centimorgan (cM) (Causse et al, 1994) to 12 cM (Lorieux et al, 1996) to 25.5 cM (Cho et al, 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of markers were identified that are closely linked to fgr (Ahn et al, 1992;Causse et al, 1994;Chen et al, 1997;Cho et al, 1998;Jin et al, 2003). Two restriction fragment length polymorphism markers, RG1 and RG28, were identified that flank fgr, with the estimates of genetic distances ranging from 10 centimorgan (cM) (Causse et al, 1994) to 12 cM (Lorieux et al, 1996) to 25.5 cM (Cho et al, 1998). After genetic mapping and sequence analysis of 17 genes in the fgr region, Bradbury et al (2005) suggested that a gene encoding putative betaine aldehyde dehydrogenase (BADH2) is most likely to be the fgr gene, due to its sequence divergence between fragrant and nonfragrant rice varieties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inconsistencies in the genotype proportions can be due to genotyping errors, to fragments of the same size scored as a single marker whereas they are derived from distinct loci or to a selective advantage as suggested in plants [3,27] and fish [48]. Non-Mendelian segregating markers occur at various rates: for instance 15% in peach rootstocks [20], 27.4% in rice [4], 56% in the silkworm [41], and 64% in Brassica oleracea [43]. On average, in each family, only 13.6 ± 5.9% of the AFLP markers developed in the Japanese quail were distorted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many studies, markers such as RFLP (restriction fragment length polymorphism), CAPS (cleaved amplified polymorphic sequence), microsatellites or genes are used together with AFLP markers. They can provide clues about the chromosome assignment of linkage groups or links to existing maps [2,31], but they can also give a framework to which AFLP markers are added [4]. Here, the markers are presented in their most likely order.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A universal core genetic map (UCGM) was constructed with different rice accessions to facilitate the comparison of low resolution genetic maps with evenly distributed markers in rice (Orjuela et al, 2009). An integrated map of AFLP, SSLP and RFLP was constructed (Cho et al, 1998) with a population derived from Milyang 23 and Gihobyeo in Korean Rice Genome Research Project (KRGRP). Another kind of marker, called as Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism (AFLP) has been described (Vos et al, 1995) and it was utilized in the genetic map construction along with previously mapped RFLP markers in rice (Causse et al, 1994;Maheswaran et al, 1997).…”
Section: Genetic Linkage Map In Ricementioning
confidence: 99%