2012
DOI: 10.1614/ws-d-11-00067.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrated Management Strategies Reduced Tall Ironweed (Vernonia altissima) Populations and Weed Biomass and Improved Tall Fescue Pasture Productivity

Abstract: Field studies were used to examine the management strategies of mowing, herbicide, fertility, and all possible combinations on tall ironweed populations, weed biomass, and pasture yield at three Kentucky locations. Mowing was performed in July 2008 and 2009, herbicide was applied in August 2008, and fertilizer was applied in September 2008 and 2009 at all locations. Weed populations were measured in 2008, 2009, and 2010, and forage grass, clover, and weed biomass was collected in May or early June of 2009 and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(43 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In pastures, S. carolinense is considered as a drought‐resistant competitor and is presumed to reduce the yield and quality of forage crops (Beeler et al, 1994). For example, population density of S. carolinense on an experimental site averaged 86 stems in 10 m 2 in a tall fescue dominated pasture (Richmond/USA; Tolson et al, 2012). Pasture weeds, such as S. carolinense , reduce desirable forage biomass through direct competition for resources or displacement of valuable forage species.…”
Section: Impactmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In pastures, S. carolinense is considered as a drought‐resistant competitor and is presumed to reduce the yield and quality of forage crops (Beeler et al, 1994). For example, population density of S. carolinense on an experimental site averaged 86 stems in 10 m 2 in a tall fescue dominated pasture (Richmond/USA; Tolson et al, 2012). Pasture weeds, such as S. carolinense , reduce desirable forage biomass through direct competition for resources or displacement of valuable forage species.…”
Section: Impactmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using stocking intensity as weed control has been well established by Harker et al (2000) when they demonstrated a reduction in weed prevalence in intensely stocked pastures without herbicide and Average N concentration of weeds was greater (2.71%; p < .01) than average N concentration of crops (2.23%, data not shown). This was not surprising because pasture weeds are high N accumulators that directly compete for resources which can reduce the growth of desirable forages (Harper et al, 1933;Tolson et al, 2012). Levels of high N stimulate competitive weed species to produce biomass quickly and early on, thus outcompeting crops.…”
Section: Weed Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a Missouri study, 70 g ha À1 aminopyralid applied in May or August reduced stem density 73 to 75% the following season (Payne et al 2010). Tolson et al (2012) reported 66 to 89% reduction in tall ironweed stems at 1 yr after August application of aminopyralid plus 2,4-D at 115 þ 1,000 g ha À1 .…”
Section: Herbicide Treatmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Management of many perennial pasture weeds has been a challenge with traditional pasture herbicides, clipping, or grazing. This is due to their tolerance of herbicides, their capacity to store ample carbohydrates in rhizomes and roots, and the fact that most grazing animals avoid them (Albert 1960;Gorrell et al 1981;Ilnicki and Fertig 1962;Marshall et al 2006;McCarty and Linscott 1963;Peters and Lowance 1978;Tolson et al 2012). Another study found that clipping reduced tall ironweed biomass, but had no positive long-term effect on weed population (Tolson et al 2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%