Integrated management of childhood illness (IMCI) strategy for children under five

Abstract

Background More than 7.5 million children younger than age five living in low- and middle-income countries die every year. The World Health Organization (WHO) developed the integrated management of childhood illness (IMCI) strategy to reduce mortality and morbidity and to improve quality of care by improving the delivery of a variety of curative and preventive medical and behavioral interventions at health facilities, at home, and in the community. Objectives To evaluate the effects of programs that implement the IMCI strategy in terms of death, nutritional status, quality of care, coverage with IMCI deliverables, and satisfaction of beneficiaries. Search methods We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2015, Issue 3), including the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC) Group Specialised Register; MEDLINE; EMBASE, Ovid; the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), EbscoHost; the Latin American Caribbean Health Sciences Literature (LILACS), Virtual Health Library (VHL); the WHO Library & Information Networks for Knowledge Database (WHOLIS); the Science Citation Index and Social Sciences Citation Index, Institute for Scientific Information (ISI) Web of Science; Population Information Online (POPLINE); the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (WHO ICTRP); and the Global Health, Ovid and Health Management, ProQuest database. We performed searches until 30 June 2015 and supplemented these by searching revised bibliographies and by contacting experts to identify ongoing and unpublished studies. Selection criteria We sought to include randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and controlled before-after (CBA) studies with at least two intervention and two control sites evaluating the generic IMCI strategy or its adaptation in children younger than age five, and including at minimum efforts to improve health care worker skills for case management. We excluded studies in which IMCI was accompanied by other interventions including conditional cash transfers, food supplementation, and employment. The comparison group received usual health services without provision of IMCI. Data collection and analysis Two review authors independently screened searches, selected trials, and extracted, analysed and tabulated data. We used inverse variance for cluster trials and an intracluster co-efficient of 0.01 when adjustment had not been made in the primary study. We used the GRADE (Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation Working Group) approach to assess the certainty of evidence. Main results Two cluster-randomised trials (India and Bangladesh) and two controlled before-after studies (Tanzania and India) met our inclusion criteria. Strategies included training of health care staff, management strengthening of health care systems (all four studies), and home visitin...

Evaluation of ‘TRY’: an algorithm for neonatal continuous positive airways pressure in low-income settings

“…For example the Integrated Management of Neonatal and Childhood Illness (IMNCI) from the WHO19 is a large-scale algorithm-based strategy, the scale up of which was thought to be a key factor in Malawi reaching Millennium Development Goal 4 20. A recent Cochrane review,21 however, presented only moderate evidence that IMNCI ‘may reduce infant mortality’ and the strategy was difficult to evaluate because it employs multiple interventions across facility, primary care and community settings. The results of this TRY-CPAP evaluation (and the previous QECH study) add to the evidence that clinical algorithms are useful in facility settings.…”

Content of Care in 15,000 Sick Child Consultations in Nine Lower‐Income Countries

“…However, the assessment of a sick child is relatively formulaic it should be very familiar to health providers in the study countries, and there has been extensive recent training to improve practice in these settings (Gera et al. ). In addition, other research has found that providers frequently know more than they practice (Mohanan et al.…”

“…However, despite the existence of protocols, quality of clinical care for sick children remains weak in many low‐income countries (Gera et al. ). To support uptake of protocols, global funders and national governments invested heavily in in‐service training courses, but this too has had limited effect on quality of care (Leslie et al.…”

“…To ensure minimum quality standards across a range of health workers, the World Health Organization developed the Integrated Management of Childhood Illness, a protocol for identifying and managing common childhood illness intended for use by a range of health care workers with proven effectiveness in improving child health outcomes (Bryce et al 2005). However, despite the existence of protocols, quality of clinical care for sick children remains weak in many low-income countries (Gera et al 2016). To support uptake of protocols, global funders and national governments invested heavily in in-service training courses, but this too has had limited effect on quality of care (Leslie et al 2016).…”

Health system strengthening—Reflections on its meaning, assessment, and our state of knowledge

“…Mother and child health integration interventions are supported by fairly good evidence of positive impacts on health outcomes (perinatal mortality and child mortality principally) and intermediate outcomes; evidence for HIV is mixed depending on the service area with which HIV services are integrated Effects on neonatal and child mortality, as well as a cluster of other health outcomes (including nutritional markers) arising from Integrated Management of Childhood Illness (IMCI) are conflicting, depending on study location and the fidelity of implementation, which has differed in marked ways between contexts . There is a clearer consensus that service quality improves where IMCI has been implemented …”