Integrated knowledge translation to strengthen public policy research: a case study from experimental research on income assistance receipt among people who use drugs

Abstract

Background Solutions to complex public health issues should be informed by scientific evidence, yet there are important differences between policy and research processes that make this relationship challenging. Integrated knowledge translation (IKT) is a strategy of sustained stakeholder engagement that intends to address barriers to evidence use. We highlight an example of an IKT project alongside a randomized controlled trial of a public policy intervention that tested different disbursement patterns of income assistance among people who use drugs in Vancouver, British Columbia. Methods A case study design was used where an IKT strategy led by a knowledge broker embedded within the research team acts as the case. This case study evaluates the process and effectiveness of the integrated knowledge translation project by measuring intermediate outcomes within a Theory of Change created to map pathways to impact. Content analysis was performed using an evaluation template through document review, post-event evaluations, and detailed tracking of media, knowledge translation activities and requests for information. Results A host of knowledge translation products synthesized existing research about the harms of synchronized income assistance disbursement and supported stakeholder engagement, facilitating conversation, relationship building and trust with stakeholders. Engagement improved knowledge of the contextual feasibility for system change, and contributed experiential knowledge to study findings. A combination of access to information and stakeholder and media engagement led to increased acknowledgement of the issue by policy makers directly involved in the income assistance system. Conclusions This project shows how a multipronged approach to IKT addressed barriers to evidence-informed public policy and successfully contributed to increased public discourse around income assistance policy reform. Additionally, sustained engagement with diverse stakeholders led to improved contextual knowledge and understanding of potential community level impacts that, along with scientific results, improved the evidence available to inform system change. This case study provides insight into the role IKT can play alongside research aimed at public policy improvements. Trial registration This IKT project was embedded within the study titled: The impact of Alternative Social Assistance Disbursement on Drug-Related Harm (TASA), known as Cheque Day Study, registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02457949) May 29, 2015.

A pragmatic evaluation of a public health knowledge broker mentoring education program: a convergent mixed methods study

“…In Canada, KBs have long been a component of efforts to support EIDM [ 21 ]. KBs in Canada are found across diverse contexts, such as facilitating stakeholder relationships for income assistance policies for people who use drugs [ 22 ], bridging the research-practice gap for uptake of measurement tools in children’s rehabilitation clinics [ 23 ], and partnering with secondary schools to facilitate the uptake of interventions to promote and improve student health [ 24 ]. While results of studies evaluating KB interventions in public health settings are mixed, KBs show promise in supporting organization wide EIDM [ 19 , 25 – 32 ].…”

Assessing the impact of knowledge communication and dissemination strategies targeted at health policy-makers and managers: an overview of systematic reviews

“…This variability and high number of frameworks was also reported in various studies as creating confusion for users regarding which to select [ 48 ]. While consensus seems to exist regarding the need for using theories, frameworks or models when designing and implementing KT interventions, there is no agreement on a specific framework [ 48 – 50 ].…”

Research With Women Who Use Drugs: Applying a Trauma-informed Framework

“…Trauma-informed research also considers how study participation and results can contribute to policy change. 14,16 Integrative Knowledge Translation, or engaging stakeholders throughout the research process to address barriers to the uptake of findings, creates meaningful interactions between researchers and stakeholders in service of reciprocal learning. 16 Integrative Knowledge Translation can be used in experimental and community-based research and aligns with results from a CBPR study, in which WWUD highlighted the need for concrete research outcomes to raise their standard of living.…”

“…14,16 Integrative Knowledge Translation, or engaging stakeholders throughout the research process to address barriers to the uptake of findings, creates meaningful interactions between researchers and stakeholders in service of reciprocal learning. 16 Integrative Knowledge Translation can be used in experimental and community-based research and aligns with results from a CBPR study, in which WWUD highlighted the need for concrete research outcomes to raise their standard of living. 6 Engaging in strengths-based research that furthers capacity-building and policy change creates a positive feedback loop, increasing the inclusion and agency of WWUD and encouraging reciprocity among researchers, stakeholders, and communities.…”