2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.1176
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrated Knowledge Management Strategy: A Preliminary Literature Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Technology deserves a special mention since it seems to act as both a constraint and an opportunity, which is in line with the findings of the previous studies (McMahon et al, 2004;Ng et al, 2012;Willmott, 2015, 2016). While the first KM ICT-based systems of the '90s were well suited for a codification strategy, the new Web 2.0 tools, and specifically the Enterprise Social Media platforms introduced by the company, appear to be more "neutral" and to favour a mixed KM approach, for they can be used to manage both tacit and explicit knowledge.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Technology deserves a special mention since it seems to act as both a constraint and an opportunity, which is in line with the findings of the previous studies (McMahon et al, 2004;Ng et al, 2012;Willmott, 2015, 2016). While the first KM ICT-based systems of the '90s were well suited for a codification strategy, the new Web 2.0 tools, and specifically the Enterprise Social Media platforms introduced by the company, appear to be more "neutral" and to favour a mixed KM approach, for they can be used to manage both tacit and explicit knowledge.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Similarly, on the basis of an analysis of four companies operating in different industries, Scheepers et al (2004) confirm that the "80-20 split" is not (necessarily) the best mix. Ng et al (2012) are also in favour of a "hybrid/integrated strategy" where there is a substantial balance of the two approaches. Greiner et al (2007) agree with HNT that a prevailing personalization strategy can be more appropriate for organisations focusing on innovation, since they face high equivocality, while organisations that pursue efficiency may face less equivocality and, consequently, tend to adopt a prevailing codification strategy.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The strategy for personalization is based on a "person-to-person" approach (Hansen et al, 1999;Greiner et al, 2007;Ng et al, 2012;Liu et al, 2013;Venkitachalam and Willmott, 2017). It has the objective of transferring, communicating, and sharing tacit knowledge via knowledge networks such as discussion forums, and IT is used to help people communicate their knowledge, not to store knowledge (Hansen et al, 1999).…”
Section: Personalization Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The KM strategy is part of KM. According to a literature review regarding KM strategies, two very different strategies were identified: The codification strategy and personalization strategy (Hansen et al, 1999;Greiner et al, 2007;Ng et al, 2012;Liu et al, 2013;Venkitachalam and Willmott, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Knowledge sharing through informal dialogue and meetings (C5) is an important aspect of top management support and can help management understand the effects of embedded knowledge and facilitate the transfer of such knowledge [6]. Ng et al [43] discussed SKM (C6) and categorized it into codification, personalization and integrated strategies.…”
Section: Proposed Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%