1994
DOI: 10.1016/0261-2194(94)90086-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrated insect pest management in oilseed rape crops in Europe

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a rational approach to control major pests, many integrated pest management (IPM) programmes have been developed, eg in oilseed rape crops,11 rice,12 oranges,13 vegetables14 and soybean 15. However, relatively few reports in the literature document the net profits of IPM programmes in comparison with conventional pesticide strategies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a rational approach to control major pests, many integrated pest management (IPM) programmes have been developed, eg in oilseed rape crops,11 rice,12 oranges,13 vegetables14 and soybean 15. However, relatively few reports in the literature document the net profits of IPM programmes in comparison with conventional pesticide strategies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This scenario may be especially viable with regard to generalist herbivores, since glucosinolates, a hypothesized antiherbivorant to generalist insects (Giamoustaris and Mithen, 1995), have been bred out of canola-quality rapeseed. Transgenic canola cultivars with insecticidal properties will certainly play a major role in integrated pest management strategies for canola pests (Talekar and Shelton, 1993;Evans and Scarisbrick, 1994).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Infochemicals associated with prey habitat, in this case rutabaga, are clearly involved in the food foraging behaviour of A. bilineata adults, as also shown for several species of parasitoids (e.g., Dicke et al, 1984;Tumlinson et al, 1993;van Alphen & Vet, 1986) and predators (Flint et al 1979;Jalil & Rodriguez, 1970;Pitman & Vité, 1971;Reid & Lampman, 1989). The response to mechanically damaged rutabaga could result from an increased release rate of plant volatiles, possibly sulfur compounds (Blaakmeer et al, 1994;Evans & Scarisbrick, 1994;Roland et al, 1995), which did not persist after 24 h (e.g., scrubbed infested rutabaga without larvae). As also demonstrated in the parasitoids Microplitis croceipes (Cresson) (Eller et al, 1988), Cotesia glomerata (L.) (Mattiacci et al, 1994), and Cotesia rubecula (Marshal) (Agelopoulos & Keller, 1994a;Geervliet et al, 1994), A. bilineata adults chose infested over uninfested prey habitat.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%