9th AIAA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization 2002
DOI: 10.2514/6.2002-5512
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrated Hypersonic Aeromechanics Tool (IHAT)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…10,11 Another approach consists of using sizing and synthesis tools that encompasses all the disciplinary analyses required to calculate a launch vehicle mission. The Hypersonic Air Vehicle Optimization Code (HAVOC) 12 and the Integrated Hypersonic Aeromechanics Tool (IHAT) 13 are two examples for this approach.…”
Section: A Launch Vehicle Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…10,11 Another approach consists of using sizing and synthesis tools that encompasses all the disciplinary analyses required to calculate a launch vehicle mission. The Hypersonic Air Vehicle Optimization Code (HAVOC) 12 and the Integrated Hypersonic Aeromechanics Tool (IHAT) 13 are two examples for this approach.…”
Section: A Launch Vehicle Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The maximum mass flow rate per unit area of the combustion products at Station 4 (the ramjet duct ahead of the nozzle) is modeled by the mass flow rate equation presented in Eq. (13). This equation serves to size the required ramjet area (A4) and to calculate the maximum allowable mass flow rate through the ramjet during the flight.…”
Section: Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 The DSM helps establish the inter-Module dependencies, which define the optimal Module execution order. In Figure 1, the rows indicate the outputs of the various Modules, and the columns indicate the inputs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This type of optimisation is suited for fine tuning of a specific design, but generally it is not suited for large geometry changes. Despite these drawbacks, grid perturbation techniques have proved useful in practice, (Carty and Davis 2004, Nemec et al 2004, Baker et al 2002, Rohl at al 1998. The second type of shape optimisation moves geometry generation inside the optimisation loop.…”
Section: Fig 1 Gas Turbine Discmentioning
confidence: 99%