2008
DOI: 10.2112/1551-5036-52.sp1.253
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrated Hydrodynamic Modeling and Frequency Analysis for Predicting 1% Storm Surge

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The storm tide piles up along the coast and within the embayments, reaching to peak heights of 5.5 at the upstream limits of Perdido, Escambia, and East Bays. This wind-induced surge effect, which we note occurs throughout the upper bay, is similar to the response calculated hy Xu and Huang (2005). At Interstate 10 Bridge in Escamhia Bay, modeled peak stormtide heights are 3.5^ m, which fall within the range of high water marks reported by Douglass et al (2004) (3-4.5 m).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The storm tide piles up along the coast and within the embayments, reaching to peak heights of 5.5 at the upstream limits of Perdido, Escambia, and East Bays. This wind-induced surge effect, which we note occurs throughout the upper bay, is similar to the response calculated hy Xu and Huang (2005). At Interstate 10 Bridge in Escamhia Bay, modeled peak stormtide heights are 3.5^ m, which fall within the range of high water marks reported by Douglass et al (2004) (3-4.5 m).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Unfortunately, the gauging station was damaged and did not record the peak surge and the setdown feature. In lieu of this, it is impossible to make reasonable comparisons for Pensacola; however, high water marks suggest a peak stormtide height of 3-4.5 m near the Interstate 10 Bridge in Escamhia Bay (Douglass et al, 2004), and previous numerical studies have calculated peak storm-tide heights of 3-3.5 m in Pensacola Bay (Xu and Huang, 2005). At Pensacola, simulated water elevations peak at 2.5 and 3.25 m when multipliers |i = 1.3 and n = 1.6 are used.…”
Section: Calibration (Hurricane Ivan)mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…When a hurricane approaches the coast, emergency management agencies and residents rely on the forecasting information relating to hurricane tracks and storm surge for preparedness and evacuation planning. Traditionally, storm surge and evacuation planning are two different research areas, with the literature mainly focusing on an individual area such as evacuation traffic only [1,2] or storm surge only [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%