2023
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-023-11412-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrated hydrobulging of prolate ellipsoids from preforms with multiple thicknesses

Abstract: The integrated hydrobulging of stainless-steel prolate ellipsoids from preforms with two thicknesses was investigated. The produced ellipsoids were closed with two 16-mm-thick closures and had nominal semiminor and semimajor axes of 89 and 125 mm, respectively. The ellipsoidal preforms comprised eight conical segments inscribed inside the target perfect ellipsoid.The four end and middle segments of the preforms had nominal thicknesses of 0.67 and 0.83 mm, respectively. The hydrobulging of these preforms was ex… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Non-uniform wall thickness could ensure the excellent hydroforming of an eggshell by achieving a uniform stress distribution. This approach was favorably validated through theoretical, numerical, and experimental analyses for the hydroforming of prolate ellipsoids from preforms with multiple thicknesses [62].…”
Section: Theoretical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Non-uniform wall thickness could ensure the excellent hydroforming of an eggshell by achieving a uniform stress distribution. This approach was favorably validated through theoretical, numerical, and experimental analyses for the hydroforming of prolate ellipsoids from preforms with multiple thicknesses [62].…”
Section: Theoretical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wall thickness was assumed uniform; the average tested value of 1.9 mm was obtained by measuring the parent stainless-steel sheet prior to hydroforming because the variations in the wall thickness of parent stainless-steel sheet were very small. Such an average assumption has been widely utilized in the previous works of Błachut et al and Zhang et al [15,16,62]. The thickness of the shell was defined as the symmetrical offset from its mid-surface, and finite shell elements were generated accordingly.…”
Section: Numerical Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%