2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2018.09.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrated GPR and ERT data interpretation for bedrock identification at Cléricy, Québec, Canada

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These geological features could affect the stability of the road. Moreover, the data accuracy in the data interpretation depends on the precision in GPR wave velocity estimation [224], being a complex task in heterogeneous media. The studies presented in [224] propose the 450 MHz ground-coupled antenna as the most appropriate system, because it offers higher resolution than antennas between 100 MHz to 200 MHz central frequency.…”
Section: Soil Subgrade Assessment and The Detection Of Bedrockmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These geological features could affect the stability of the road. Moreover, the data accuracy in the data interpretation depends on the precision in GPR wave velocity estimation [224], being a complex task in heterogeneous media. The studies presented in [224] propose the 450 MHz ground-coupled antenna as the most appropriate system, because it offers higher resolution than antennas between 100 MHz to 200 MHz central frequency.…”
Section: Soil Subgrade Assessment and The Detection Of Bedrockmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the data accuracy in the data interpretation depends on the precision in GPR wave velocity estimation [224], being a complex task in heterogeneous media. The studies presented in [224] propose the 450 MHz ground-coupled antenna as the most appropriate system, because it offers higher resolution than antennas between 100 MHz to 200 MHz central frequency. This result is a consequence of the GPR wave attenuation, allowing for the detection of discontinuities until a maximum depth of 5 m in all cases, based on the observation of different textures in the B-scans.…”
Section: Soil Subgrade Assessment and The Detection Of Bedrockmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The joint use of GPR and ERT can be effective for an enhanced characterization of geological features in karst (Elawadi et al, 2006;El-Qady et al, 2005). The combination of GPR and ERT surveys has been used to identify bedrock (Diallo et al, 2019), and gypsum deposits in urban areas (Gołębiowski & Jarosińska, 2019), and geological structure of karst unsaturated zone (Carrière et al, 2013), and to assess the risk of subsidence of a sinkhole collapse (Gómez-Ortiz & Martín-Crespo, 2012). Most of these studies show that the GPR method has advantages in the imaging of vertical and inclined fractures near the surface, and that the ERT method has advantages in delineating horizontal structures.…”
Section: Core Ideasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most important physical properties of the materials for GPR and resistivity data interpretation are the relative dielectric permittivity (or dielectric constant) and the electrical resistivity, respectively (Diallo et al, 2019). Table 1 shows examples of these properties for some common materials from the investigation of the other sites.…”
Section: Physical Properties Of Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[34][35][36]. Therefore, GPR is widely used in geotechnical engineering, environmental protection, archeological site detection, geological research, underground pipeline detection, detection of urban public facilities, and military detection [37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46]. Based on this, GPR has more advantages in continuous long-distance highway engineering detection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%