2007
DOI: 10.1088/1742-2132/4/3/s12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrated geophysical surveys for the safety evaluation of a ground subsidence zone in a small city

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Over the past decades, land subsidence was analyzed using borehole hydrogeological data, optical remote sensing images, leveling, and GPS data. Recently, the need of acquiring more comprehensive information on the structure and geological properties of the subsurface to understand the mechanisms driving uneven land subsidence became evident (Kim et al, 2007; Smith & Knight, 2019; Teatini et al, 2011). Although borehole information can precisely reveal the formation structure and lithology at specific locations, these data are expensive and insufficient to comprehensively reveal geological structure of underground space, especially in faulted basins.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the past decades, land subsidence was analyzed using borehole hydrogeological data, optical remote sensing images, leveling, and GPS data. Recently, the need of acquiring more comprehensive information on the structure and geological properties of the subsurface to understand the mechanisms driving uneven land subsidence became evident (Kim et al, 2007; Smith & Knight, 2019; Teatini et al, 2011). Although borehole information can precisely reveal the formation structure and lithology at specific locations, these data are expensive and insufficient to comprehensively reveal geological structure of underground space, especially in faulted basins.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two main approaches were developed to improve the quality of underground cave locating. The first one consists of the ERT application in combination with other geophysical methods, i.e., with ground penetrating radar (LEUCCI and DE GIORGI 2005;EL KHAMMARI et al 2007;KIM et al 2007), with magnetic (KIM et al 2007GUERIN et al 2009), with self-potential tomography (WILKINSON et al 2005) and seismic (GUERIN et al 2009;CARDARELLI et al 2009) or even several geophysical methods (KIM et al 2007;GUERIN et al 2009). However, the application of several geophysical methods being used for an engineering aim is highly time-consuming and expensive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geophysical methods such as seismic, microgravity, self-potential, electrical resistivity, electromagnetic, and ground-penetrating radar are more advantageous for geohazard investigations because of their nonintrusive nature and cost effectiveness [ 4 , 8 , 9 ]. This is particularly the case in urbanised areas, in which the use of direct methods is virtually impossible [ 10 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In such areas, geophysical methods can provide a cost-effective solution for investigating the subsurface and for detecting cavity formation and voids [ 4 , 11 , 12 ]. In this context, the principal task of geophysical surveys is to identify precisely the presence of cavities [ 9 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%