Advanced Power Plant Materials, Design and Technology 2010
DOI: 10.1533/9781845699468.1.54
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) power plant design and technology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(36 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are three basic types of gasifiers, namely moving bed gasifier (MBG), fluidised bed gasifier (FBG), and entrained flow gasifier (EFG). These gasifiers differ in terms of handling feed [10,13,14], fluidised bed gasifiers [15][16][17][18], entrained flow gasifiers [10,[19][20][21]. (3)…”
Section: Types Of Gasifiersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are three basic types of gasifiers, namely moving bed gasifier (MBG), fluidised bed gasifier (FBG), and entrained flow gasifier (EFG). These gasifiers differ in terms of handling feed [10,13,14], fluidised bed gasifiers [15][16][17][18], entrained flow gasifiers [10,[19][20][21]. (3)…”
Section: Types Of Gasifiersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Moving bed gasifiers are again classified into two types depending on the direction of feed and gasifying agents flowing through them. A vast source of literature deals with different types of gasifiers, some of the studies are referred with respect to each type of gasifier: fixed or moving bed gasifiers 10, 13, 14, fluidised bed gasifiers 15–18, entrained flow gasifiers 10, 19–21.…”
Section: Types Of Gasifiersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are four main CO 2 capture technologies, that is, chemical absorption, adsorption, membrane separation and cryogenic distillation. Chemical absorption is the most researched, implemented and commercialized option among the named separation technologies, especially in post‐combustion capture due to its distinct advantages 11,14,29–35 . These advantages include excellent CO 2 absorption efficiency of 80–100%, adaptability to low‐pressure conditions and capability to produce high purity CO 2 (up to 99%) 2,12–14,31,32,34,36–41 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chemical absorption is the most researched, implemented and commercialized option among the named separation technologies, especially in post-combustion capture due to its distinct advantages. 11,14,[29][30][31][32][33][34][35] These advantages include excellent CO 2 absorption efficiency of 80-100%, adaptability to low-pressure conditions and capability to produce high purity CO 2 (up to 99%). 2,[12][13][14]31,32,34,[36][37][38][39][40][41] Adsorption is also a highly regarded CO 2 separation technology due to its excellent CO 2 capture efficiency of up to 90% and flexibility to be implemented in post-and pre-combustion CO 2 capture.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite these numerous advantages, this technology presents a couple of limitations that should be mentioned as well. Dry-feed gasification is limited in terms of maximal permissible pressure . Additionally, there are requirements concerning the feed preparation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%