The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2008.02.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrated feasible direction method and genetic algorithm for optimal planning of harmonic filters with uncertainty conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, our objective is to find a gain K which keeps both and at a low level. Other system parameters are given as follow: (19) where DPF represents the compensated load-displacement power factor, ad '1' means the fundamental component.…”
Section: ⅱ Problem Formulation a Two Popular Topologies Of Hapfmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, our objective is to find a gain K which keeps both and at a low level. Other system parameters are given as follow: (19) where DPF represents the compensated load-displacement power factor, ad '1' means the fundamental component.…”
Section: ⅱ Problem Formulation a Two Popular Topologies Of Hapfmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some scholars use these meta-heuristic methods to designed the filters in the power system. For example, predator-prey based firefly optimization [15], ant colony optimization [16], particle swarm optimization [17], ant direction hybrid DE [18], genetic algorithms [19], bacterial foraging optimization [20], etc. However, most of these methods are applied to design PPF; a small number of meta-heuristic methods are used to design HAPF.…”
Section: ⅰ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To illustrate previous research works which have been conducted regarding the methodology and different types of the filters used in the harmonic compensation framework, Table 1 comprehensively shows the harmonic compensation taxonomy including various studies. [ 7–52 ] Based on the magnitude of the harmonic pollution by NLs, it was decided to utilize one or multiple PPFs and APLCs to participate in harmonic compensation. This framework can consist of an objective function (OF) or multiOFs, uncertainty consideration, single‐objective or multiobjective solution method, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The utilization of PPFs has been presented in various studies. [ 7–31 ] As shown in Table 1, the single‐objective metaheuristic algorithms, such as hybrid differential algorithm, [ 7 ] particle swarm optimization (PSO), [ 8 ] genetic algorithm (GA), [ 9,11 ] ant colony, [ 10 ] bacterial foraging optimization, [ 12 ] whale optimization, [ 13 ] cuckoo search algorithm, [ 16 ] adaptive dynamic clone selection algorithm, [ 20 ] and modified bat algorithm, [ 21 ] are utilized for solving the harmonic compensation problem considering PPFs. For instance, a new fuzzy method in the study by Ayoubi et al [ 16 ] has been used for fixed and switched PPF allocation, solving by the nonhomogeneous cuckoo search algorithm and considering preventing resonance conditions as a vital constraint.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [8], an enhanced current control approach is proposed that seamlessly integrates system harmonic mitigation capabilities with the primary DG power generation function. In [9], a genetic algorithm and a feasible direction method are applied for optimal planning of harmonic filters with uncertainty conditions. An optimal method for active power filter is presented in [10] to improve power quality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%