1996
DOI: 10.1109/75.541459
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrated FDTD and solid-state device simulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…on and off. Therefore, for small-signal modeling, it is not required to directly couple the semiconductor physics with Maxwell's equations during simulation, which would not be the case for nonlinear largesignal modeling [6]. Instead, in this preliminary work, the Extended-FDTD approach is used to model PIN diodes with a relatively good accuracy.…”
Section: Full-wave Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…on and off. Therefore, for small-signal modeling, it is not required to directly couple the semiconductor physics with Maxwell's equations during simulation, which would not be the case for nonlinear largesignal modeling [6]. Instead, in this preliminary work, the Extended-FDTD approach is used to model PIN diodes with a relatively good accuracy.…”
Section: Full-wave Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our GaAs PIN diode case, m n and m p are 450 and 8000 cm 2 /Vs. On the other hand, under reverse bias, another approximation that is used instead of running a driftdiffusion simulator is to assume a constant depletion capacitance [9]: (6) Here e is the dielectric constant of the depletion layer material. In Fig.…”
Section: Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Various solid-state models exist for these types of devices [1] and have been previously integrated with electromagnetic simulators (EMS), such as FDTD [2,3,4]. However, most of the prior implantations of this coupling have been limited in application due to the fact that the application of the CFL conditions [1] and stability requirements for the two models yields disparate time steps often with several orders of magnitude difference [2,3]. The active device simulator (DS) has the smallest time and space stepping.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, in contrast to other standard NLTL's, an optimized inhomogenous doping profile was designed to achieve a faster compression of the falling edge of the output signal. For a better and faster large-signal modelling of the diodes, the device response is extracted from the geometry and doping profile itself applying the finite difference method to the drift-diffusion model as it was previously done in [9] and [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%